These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12425989)

  • 41. Morphological evaluation of changes in velopharyngeal function following maxillary distraction in patients with repaired cleft palate during mixed dentition.
    Satoh K; Nagata J; Shomura K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J; Shiba R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Jul; 41(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 15222793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Advancement of the anterior maxilla by distraction (case report).
    Karakasis D; Hadjipetrou L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 15113572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Palate re-repair revisited.
    Sommerlad BC; Mehendale FV; Birch MJ; Sell D; Hattee C; Harland K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 12019005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Brunner M; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Pröschel U; Verres R; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Nov; 42(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 16241177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with cleft lip and palate.
    Scolozzi P; Herzog G; Jaques B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 18812875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction.
    Lo LJ; Hung KF; Chen YR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Feb; 109(2):688-98; discussion 699-700. PubMed ID: 11818854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perceptual speech assessment after maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with a repaired cleft lip and palate.
    Kim SK; Kim JC; Moon JB; Lee KC
    Arch Plast Surg; 2012 May; 39(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 22783526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A Preliminary Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Aesthetics Following Le Fort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Davidson E; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):e629-33. PubMed ID: 26468849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis: report of 2 cases.
    Alkan A; Baş B; Ozer M; Bayram M; Yüzbasioğlu E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 18083426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Importance of soft tissue for skeletal stability in maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Baumann A; Sinko K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12498607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Hirano A; Suzuki H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11204674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
    Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Surgical maxillary advancement and speech resonance: comparison among cleft types.
    Medeiros-Santana MNL; Araújo BMAM; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IEK; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2020; 32(4):e20190152. PubMed ID: 32401996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Impact of Maxillary Advancement on Consonant Proficiency in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate, Lay Listeners' Opinion, and Patients' Satisfaction With Speech.
    Hagberg E; Flodin S; Granqvist S; Karsten A; Neovius E; Lohmander A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Apr; 56(4):454-461. PubMed ID: 29949386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stability after Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Saelen R; Tornes K; Halse A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 10196819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Maxillary distraction resulting in facial advancement at Le Fort III level in cleft lip and palate patients: a report of two cases.
    Zwahlen RA; Bütow KW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 15529125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Lin X; Zhou N; Huang X; Song S; Li H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e480-e484. PubMed ID: 29561487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of the Distance of Maxillary Advancement on Horizontal Relapse After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Fahradyan A; Wolfswinkel EM; Clarke N; Park S; Tsuha M; Urata MM; Hammoudeh JA; Yamashita DR
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Apr; 55(4):546-553. PubMed ID: 29554455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hypertrophied tonsils impair velopharyngeal function after palatoplasty.
    Abdel-Aziz M
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Mar; 122(3):528-32. PubMed ID: 22252734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients.
    Mehra P; Wolford LM; Hopkin JK; Castro V; Frietas R
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 12387610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.