143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12426510)
1. Improving peer review: a guide for reviewers of biomedical research.
Reidenberg JW
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2002 Nov; 72(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 12426510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tips for manuscript reviewers.
Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA
Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12841086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
Stijntjes F; Veeken H
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading and weighting of publications for senior academics.
Olumide F; Abiodun-Wright W
West Afr J Med; 2007; 26(1):57. PubMed ID: 17595996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
Couzin J
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to review a manuscript.
Spigt M; Arts IC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 63(12):1385-90. PubMed ID: 20971423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mentored Reviews: Maintaining the Transparency and Confidentiality of Peer Review.
Rogers RG
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):291. PubMed ID: 27564384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing.
Pietrzak WS
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 20485095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.
Ohler L
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 16350891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
HEART Group
Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research.
Bhandari S
Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The current situation regarding the establishment of national ethical guidelines for biomedical research in Thailand and its neighboring countries.
Kojima S; Waikagul J; Rojekittikhun W; Keicho N
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2005 May; 36(3):728-32. PubMed ID: 16124447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
HEART Group
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial peer review in biomedical publishing: an overview.
Napolitani Cheyne F
Rom J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 13(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15229782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
