367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12426709)
1. Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Apr; (8):1-15. PubMed ID: 12426709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The secret life of the dominant form of managed care: self-insured ERISA networks.
Weller CD
Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):305-48. PubMed ID: 10178391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.
Butler PA
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2004 Aug; 5(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 15298011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical guide to preemption for self-insured plans.
Wallace AM
Benefits Q; 1998; 14(2):39-41. PubMed ID: 10179243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent developments in employee benefits law.
Rose JG; Adler A
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2005; 40(2):345-68. PubMed ID: 15881784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marketplace. New U.S. appeals court ruling opens wide holes in ERISA preemption.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Jul; 52(28):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10181086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The circuitous journey to the Patients' Bill of Rights: winners and losers.
Reece S
Albany Law Rev; 2000-2001; 65(1):17-95. PubMed ID: 11949702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act.
Hansen E
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health care continuation coverage. Final rules.
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor
Fed Regist; 2004 May; 69(102):30083-112. PubMed ID: 15162808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
Copeland C; Pierron B
EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative care and ERISA erosion.
Gemignani J
Bus Health; 1998 Sep; 16(9):27. PubMed ID: 10185125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Dec; 93(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 26626981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managed care's Crimea: medical necessity, therapeutic benefit, and the goals of administrative process in health insurance.
Sage WM
Duke Law J; 2003 Nov; 53(2):597-651. PubMed ID: 15241875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Emerging theories of liability for utilization review under ERISA health plans.
Pomfret SD
Tort Insur Law J; 1998; 34(1):131-66. PubMed ID: 10558440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Profusion of health care laws creates compliance problems for health plans.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):10-2. PubMed ID: 12369342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Wielding the wand without facing the music: allowing utilization review physicians to trump doctors' orders, but protecting them from legal risk ordinarily attached to the medical degree.
Record KL
Duke Law J; 2010 Feb; 59(5):955-1000. PubMed ID: 20235400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
