224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12426828)
1. [Detection of coronary calcinosis with multislice spiral computerized tomography: an alternative to electron beam tomography].
Knez A; Becker A; Becker C; Leber A; Boekstegers P; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Z Kardiol; 2002 Aug; 91(8):642-9. PubMed ID: 12426828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of coronary calcium with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: a comparative study with electron-beam CT.
Knez A; Becker C; Becker A; Leber A; White C; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2002 Aug; 18(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 12123323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Importance of ECG-triggering with the multi-slice CT for ruling out coronary calcification in individuals without diagnosed coronary disease].
Silber S;
Herz; 2001 Jun; 26(4):260-72. PubMed ID: 11479938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of varying slice thickness on coronary calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography in vitro and in vivo.
Mühlenbruch G; Thomas C; Wildberger JE; Koos R; Das M; Hohl C; Katoh M; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Nov; 40(11):695-9. PubMed ID: 16230901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography.
Ulzheimer S; Kalender WA
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):484-97. PubMed ID: 12594550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of spiral and electron beam tomography in the evaluation of coronary calcification in asymptomatic persons.
Budoff MJ; Mao S; Zalace CP; Bakhsheshi H; Oudiz RJ
Int J Cardiol; 2001 Feb; 77(2-3):181-8. PubMed ID: 11182182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study.
Groen JM; Greuter MJ; Vliegenthart R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Zijlstra F; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jun; 24(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 18038190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: a phantom study.
Greuter MJ; Dijkstra H; Groen JM; Vliegenthart R; de Lange F; Renema WK; de Bock GH; Oudkerk M
Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3510-9. PubMed ID: 17926954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The influence of motion artifacts conditioned by reconstruction, on the coronary calcium score in multislice spiral CT].
Mahnken AH; Sinha AM; Wildberger JE; Krombach GA; Schmitz-Rode T; Günther RW
Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):888-92. PubMed ID: 11588674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Significance of calcium detection with electron-beam tomography in coronary disease].
Haberl R; Knez A; Becker A; Becker C; Maass A; Brüning R; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Radiologe; 1998 Dec; 38(12):999-1005. PubMed ID: 9931974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: how accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume?
Horiguchi J; Shen Y; Akiyama Y; Hirai N; Sasaki K; Ishifuro M; Ito K
Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 16175352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study.
Groen JM; Kofoed KF; Zacho M; Vliegenthart R; Willems TP; Greuter MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23092538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Detection of coronary calcifications by electron beam tomography and multislice spiral CT: clinical relevance].
Achenbach S; Schmermund A; Erbel R; Silber S; Haberl R; Moshage W; Daniel WG
Z Kardiol; 2003 Nov; 92(11):899-907. PubMed ID: 14634759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography with a new electrocardiographic trigger method.
Mao S; Budoff MJ; Bakhsheshi H; Liu SC
Invest Radiol; 2001 Jul; 36(7):363-7. PubMed ID: 11496091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography.
Achenbach S; Giesler T; Ropers D; Ulzheimer S; Anders K; Wenkel E; Pohle K; Kachelriess M; Derlien H; Kalender W; Daniel WG; Bautz W; Baum U
Invest Radiol; 2003 Feb; 38(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 12544075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT.
Stanford W; Thompson BH; Burns TL; Heery SD; Burr MC
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 14752183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quantitative analysis of coronary artery calcinosis: comparative informative value of multispiral computed tomography and electron-beam tomography].
Ternovoĭ SK; Fedotenkov IS; Gagarina NV; Veselova TN; Sinitsyn VE
Ter Arkh; 2006; 78(12):15-9. PubMed ID: 17294857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recommendations for standardization of EBT and MSCT scanning.
Achenbach S; Daniel WG; Moshage W
Herz; 2001 Jun; 26(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 11479939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three generations of electron beam tomography on image noise and reproducibility, a phantom study.
Chau A; Gopal A; Mao S; Tseng PH; Fischer H; Budoff MJ
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 16763471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
