These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12427402)

  • 21. Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Henriksen TB; Sperling L; Hedegaard M; Ulrichsen H; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8116350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical study on 67 cases with uterine rupture].
    Xiaoxia B; Zhengping W; Xiaofu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 25030728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Peterson HB; Martinez-Schnell B; Thompson RJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 2403133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experience with an active labour management protocol and reduction of caesarean section rate in Nicaragua.
    Bood T
    Trop Doct; 1990 Jul; 20(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 2219421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modern indications for cesarean section.
    Mann LI; Gallant J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 484640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigation of cesarean sections at Konya Training and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department between 2010 and 2015.
    Inal ZO; Inal HA; Kucukkendirci H; Oruc AS
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):185-190. PubMed ID: 28509319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
    Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of caesarean delivery in Jimma Hospital, south-western Ethiopia.
    Ali Y
    East Afr Med J; 1995 Jan; 72(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 7781560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Giacomelli GJ; Hohmann SF
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Aug; 26(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-year period (1997-2012).
    Lurie S; Shalev A; Sadan O; Golan A
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 27590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rate of cesarean delivery at hospitals providing emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh.
    Islam MT; Yoshimura Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 25257570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.
    Ofir K; Sheiner E; Levy A; Katz M; Mazor M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4):1042-6. PubMed ID: 14586352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Epidemiology of Cesarean section and birth surveillance].
    Panico MG; Romano N; Trinchese N; Agozzino E
    Ann Ig; 2002; 14(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 12070897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Caesarean section rates in teaching hospitals of Tehran: 1999-2003.
    Moini A; Riazi K; Ebrahimi A; Ostovan N
    East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 17684866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cesarean section rates and indications in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country study from Medecins sans Frontieres.
    Chu K; Cortier H; Maldonado F; Mashant T; Ford N; Trelles M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44484. PubMed ID: 22962616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome of cesarean section in twin pregnancy.
    Unuigbe JA; Orhue AA; Feyi-Waboso PA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Jun; 26(3):393-7. PubMed ID: 2900168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.