These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12427639)

  • 1. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
    Binaghi S; Maeder P; Uské A; Meuwly JY; Devuyst G; Meuli RA
    Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ito K; Sasaki M; Kobayashi M; Ogasawara K; Nishihara T; Takahashi T; Natori T; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Kudo K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
    Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Elgersma OE; Buskens E; Hunink MG; Kappelle LJ; Buijs PC; Wüst AF; van der Lugt A; van der Graaf Y
    Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):2003-8. PubMed ID: 12154253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
    Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
    Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
    Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
    J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.