These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12428931)

  • 1. Factors leading to the removal of the intrauterine implant Gynefix.
    Bonacho I; Gómez-Besteiro MI; Pita S
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Sep; 7(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12428931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GyneFix: a UK experience.
    Geyoushi BE; Randall S; Stones RW
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 12041865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes at 1 year for the first 200 patients fitted with GyneFix at Margaret Pyke Centre.
    Masters T; Everett S; May M; Guillebaud J
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Jun; 7(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 12201324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Randomized comparative study of GyneFix IN and TCu 380A intrauterine devices].
    Wu S; Hu J; Wu M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 33(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 10806672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system.
    Delbarge W; Bátár I; Bafort M; Bonnivert J; Colmant C; Dhont M; Fonzé V; Gevers R; Janssens D; Lavalley P; Salmin E; Degueldre M; Vrijens M; Van Kets H; Wildemeersch D
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12041861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge and use of emergency contraception in a tertiary referral unit in a developing country.
    Siebert I; Steyn PS
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Sep; 7(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 12428932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GyneFIX. The frameless intrauterine contraceptive implant--an update for interval, emergency and postabortal contraception.
    Wildemeersch D; Batár I; Webb A; Gbolade BA; Delbarge W; Temmerman M; Dhont M; Guillebaud J
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):149-59. PubMed ID: 10023101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraception use and probability of continuation: community-based survey of women in southern Jordan.
    Youssef RM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2005 Jul; 11(4):545-58. PubMed ID: 16700369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study.
    Kowalski TJ; Berbari EF; Huddleston PM; Steckelberg JM; Mandrekar JN; Osmon DR
    Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Apr; 44(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 17342641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative analysis of the modification of sexual desire of users of oral hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Martin-Loeches M; Ortí RM; Monfort M; Ortega E; Rius J
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2003 Sep; 8(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 14667322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix 200 intrauterine system.
    Cao X; Zhang W; Zhao X; Lin N; Wang L; Li C; Song L; Zhang W; Zhang Z; Wildemeersch D
    Contraception; 2004 Mar; 69(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 14969668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience with GyneFIX insertions in Spain: favorable acceptance of the intrauterine contraceptive implant with some limitations.
    Martinez F; Gimenez E; Hernández G; Alvarez D; Tejada M; García P; Ruiz C; Abril C; Izquierdo B; Avecilla A; Ramirez A; Cadiñanos M; Dominguez N; Doval JL; Rodriguez MJ; Rodriguez V; Turrado V; Omar-Fayez A;
    Contraception; 2002 Nov; 66(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 12443961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical study of the copper intrauterine T contraceptive device].
    Rustrián Azamar A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Sep; 40(239):207-9. PubMed ID: 976763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Insertion problems, removal problems, and contraception failures with Implanon].
    Bensouda-Grimaldi L; Jonville-Béra AP; Beau-Salinas F; Llabres S; Autret-Leca E;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Dec; 33(12):986-90. PubMed ID: 16321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraception during perimenopause.
    Kailas NA; Sifakis S; Koumantakis E
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2005 Mar; 10(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16036294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices.
    Johnson BA
    Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comparison of reproductive health data in a rural district in Turkey (1981-2001).
    Aytekin NT; Pala K; Akiş N; Nacarküçük S; Aytekin H
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Dec; 7(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 12648296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. TCu 380A IUD: a reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age.
    Bahamondes L; Faundes A; Sobreira-Lima B; Lui-Filho JF; Pecci P; Matera S
    Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 16246658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.