These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12429368)

  • 1. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hopf JM; Bader M; Meng M; Bayer J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 12429368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.
    Osterhout L; Holcomb PJ; Swinney DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):786-803. PubMed ID: 8064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phrase length matters: the interplay between implicit prosody and syntax in Korean "garden path" sentences.
    Hwang H; Steinhauer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3555-75. PubMed ID: 21391765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.
    Hopf JM; Bayer J; Bader M; Meng M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Mar; 10(2):264-80. PubMed ID: 9555111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.
    Friederici AD; Mecklinger A; Spencer KM; Steinhauer K; Donchin E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):305-23. PubMed ID: 11275491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.
    Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(11):1531-49. PubMed ID: 10906378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Mason RA; Just MA; Keller TA; Carpenter PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1319-38. PubMed ID: 14622064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 12590846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish.
    Carreiras M; Salillas E; Barber H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 15130594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):621-35. PubMed ID: 14561450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological evidence for a subject-first strategy in visually situated auditory sentence processing in Korean.
    Lee SY; Nam Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Nov; 231():103799. PubMed ID: 36473388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.
    Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Weber-Fox C
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 18945484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological support for strategic processing of spatial sentences.
    Noordzij ML; Van Der Lubbe RH; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 May; 43(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 16805866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information--ERP evidence from German.
    Augurzky P; Kotchoubey B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():31-49. PubMed ID: 26656565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.
    Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel I
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 16765335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causality and signalling of garden-path sentences.
    Wang D; Sadrzadeh M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Mar; 382(2268):20230013. PubMed ID: 38281713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.