These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12429368)

  • 21. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.
    Erdocia K; Laka I; Mestres-Missé A; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Apr; 109(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19223065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural Measures Reveal Implicit Learning during Language Processing.
    Batterink LJ; Cheng LY; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1636-49. PubMed ID: 27243616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.
    Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.
    Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 May; 30(3):267-95. PubMed ID: 11523275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disfluencies along the garden path: brain electrophysiological evidence of disrupted sentence processing.
    Maxfield ND; Lyon JM; Silliman ER
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):86-100. PubMed ID: 19765813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis.
    Ferreira F; Christianson K; Hollingworth A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 Jan; 30(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11291182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian "who"-questions: a study with event-related potentials.
    Penolazzi B; De Vincenzi M; Angrilli A; Job R
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory effects in syntactic ERP tasks.
    Sabourin L; Stowe L
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):392-5. PubMed ID: 15177820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions.
    Friederici AD; von Cramon DY; Kotz SA
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1033-47. PubMed ID: 10356057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken English garden path sentences: ERP evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis.
    Pauker E; Itzhak I; Baum SR; Steinhauer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2731-51. PubMed ID: 21281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ambiguous function words do not prevent 18-month-olds from building accurate syntactic category expectations: An ERP study.
    Brusini P; Dehaene-Lambertz G; van Heugten M; de Carvalho A; Goffinet F; Fiévet AC; Christophe A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():4-12. PubMed ID: 27544044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Multiple-Channel Model of Task-Dependent Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Comprehension.
    Logačev P; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 25823920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects.
    Friederici AD; Hahne A; Mecklinger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1219-48. PubMed ID: 8805821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Syntactic and semantic processing of Chinese middle sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zeng T; Mao W; Lu Q
    Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):568-73. PubMed ID: 27028353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm.
    Lüdtke J; Friedrich CK; De Filippis M; Kaup B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1355-70. PubMed ID: 18303972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.