These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12430053)

  • 1. [Continuous mental disorder as a prerequisite for the loss of legal capacity].
    Habermeyer E; Sass H
    Nervenarzt; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1094-9. PubMed ID: 12430053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Psychiatric evaluation in civil law].
    Foerster K
    Nervenarzt; 1992 Mar; 63(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 1579170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Expert assessment in civil rights. Determination of work capacity--from the legal viewpoint].
    Schmudlach H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug; 86(15-16):771-3; discussion 781-2. PubMed ID: 1441616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Forensic-psychiatric criteria for evaluating the capacity to take decisions freely and consciously and to express one's will].
    Kocur J; Trendak W
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20073264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Forensic psychiatry evaluation of mental competence--from psychopathological case analysis to assessment].
    von Oefele K
    Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Oct; 58(10):543-6. PubMed ID: 9035785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Legal guardians--disability--management--from the legal viewpoint].
    Holzhauer H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug; 86(15-16):824-30; discussion 830-3. PubMed ID: 1441627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Expert assessment in civil rights. Determination of working capacity--from the physicians viewpoint].
    Rasch W
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug; 86(15-16):767-70; discussion 781-2. PubMed ID: 1441615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Expert testimony according to the new legislation].
    Kiermeier B
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1991; 53(8-9):522-5. PubMed ID: 1837885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Psychiatric anamnesis, psychiatric findings and their relevance for legal questions in psychiatric assessment before the social court].
    Zeit T; Wiester W
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Mar; 66(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 7753244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The craft of psychiatric evaluation].
    Hoffmann-Richter U
    Psychiatr Prax; 2005 Jul; 32(5):258-60. PubMed ID: 15983878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary: The clinical implications of doctors' evaluating doctors.
    Wall BW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15809245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of expert assessment of disability with reference to selected diagnostic groups by the Medical Service of Hospital Insurance].
    Rädisch T; Erben CM; Conrad P; Schölch U
    Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Mar; 58(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 8645903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].
    Krupinski M
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Dec; 56(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 7841673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of legal capacity and testamentary capacity].
    Dreßing H; Foerster K; Leygraf J; Schneider F
    Nervenarzt; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1441-50; quiz 1451-2. PubMed ID: 25256794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].
    Pietzcker A
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):623-6. PubMed ID: 9064935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: Quality improvement and psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians.
    Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 15809246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Claims and reality of public health expert assessment using legal public health guidelines].
    Peters U
    Gesundheitswesen; 1992 Jun; 54(6):303-5. PubMed ID: 1643326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on guidelines for psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians.
    Anfang SA; Faulkner LR; Fromson JA; Gendel MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 15809244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The Bellak and Associates Ego Function Rating in general practice of psychiatric expert assessment].
    Schmidt P
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1989 Feb; 41(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 2727175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.