288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12430513)
1. Use claims data to spotlight weaknesses in delivery of care.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Oct; 6(10):149-52. PubMed ID: 12430513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.
Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP65-75. PubMed ID: 12822716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value Health focuses on pretreatment intervention.
Levick D
Contract Healthc; 1988 Oct; ():16-7. PubMed ID: 10291181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a physician-owned plan.
Fine A
Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1998 Aug; 1(6):2-3, 20. PubMed ID: 10185385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. External review: both sides benefit.
Coleman DL
Healthplan; 2000; 41(5):26-30. PubMed ID: 11139998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond the cost of health care: the new era of quality and liability in managed care.
Wolfson J; Levin PJ; Campbell RR
J Fla Med Assoc; 1988 Mar; 75(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 3361280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating health plan quality 1: a conceptual model.
Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP53-64. PubMed ID: 12822715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coping with managed care.
Thier S
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):16, 18. PubMed ID: 10293494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Managed care--a symposium.
Miller A; Herman GP; Davis PA; London AE; Klionsky MM; Howe JP; Gaver KD; Scott RR; Weissburg C
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):19-25. PubMed ID: 10293495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Managed care. When, where and why.
Roovers T
US Healthc; 1989 Feb; 6(2):32-3, 37. PubMed ID: 10291697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. California doctors fear that NCQA would be too lenient with plans.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2005 Aug; 14(8):15-6. PubMed ID: 16173276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical voice of managed care.
Epstein DC
Physician Exec; 2010; 36(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 20704086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-delegated utilization review offers control and objectivity.
Fine A
Contract Healthc; 1988 Jun; ():23. PubMed ID: 10290598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Designing a complaint and grievance system and other member assistance services under Medicaid managed care.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Feb; (7):1-14. PubMed ID: 12426708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Special report. Doing business with managed care plans: making the best of it.
Bolinger R
Health Policy Week; 1989 Jul; 18(27):suppl 1-6. PubMed ID: 10293939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Point/counterpoint: provider and reviewer speak out on utilization management. Discussion.
London AE; Anderson RA
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(4):36, 38-40. PubMed ID: 10288314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health care rationing through inconvenience. The third party's secret weapon.
Grumet GW
N Engl J Med; 1989 Aug; 321(9):607-11. PubMed ID: 2668766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating health plan quality 3: survey measurement properties.
Wholey DR; Finch M; Christianson JB; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP76-87. PubMed ID: 12822717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Provider profiling: doing it right.
Diamond LH
Healthplan; 2000; 41(3):74-5, 78-82. PubMed ID: 11066253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoring trust to managed care, Part 3: A focus on public stakeholders.
Kirkman-Liff B
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Apr; 9(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 12703676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
