These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12430818)

  • 1. Optimizing the acquisition time of the middle latency response using maximum length sequences and chirps.
    Bell SL; Allen R; Lutman ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2065-73. PubMed ID: 12430818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feasibility of maximum length sequences to reduce acquisition time of the middle latency response.
    Bell SL; Allen R; Lutman ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1073-81. PubMed ID: 11303921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological changes in the middle latency response using maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Nagle S; Musiek FE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):492-502. PubMed ID: 19764169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of high stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses in the estimation of hearing threshold.
    Leung SM; Slaven A; Thornton AR; Brickley GJ
    Hear Res; 1998 Sep; 123(1-2):201-5. PubMed ID: 9745967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of chopper units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised guinea pig to clicks-in-noise and click trains.
    Burkard R; Palmer AR
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):234-50. PubMed ID: 9282906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.
    Elberling C; Don M; Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2772-85. PubMed ID: 18189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brainstem response recording to multiple interleaved broadband chirps.
    Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E; Don M; Müller-Mazzotta J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):466-79. PubMed ID: 22343544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The auditory middle latency response, evoked using maximum length sequences and chirps, as an indicator of adequacy of anesthesia.
    Bell SL; Smith DC; Allen R; Lutman ME
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):495-8. PubMed ID: 16428549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory evoked potentials for monitoring during anaesthesia: a study of data quality.
    Notley SV; Bell SL; Smith DC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Mar; 32(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 20015674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cochlear traveling wave and neural adaptation on auditory brainstem responses.
    Junius D; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):53-67. PubMed ID: 15953515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are chirps better than clicks and tonebursts for evoking middle latency responses?
    Atcherson SR; Moore PC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 25313547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory brainstem responses recorded at fast stimulation rates using maximum length sequences.
    Thornton AR; Slaven A
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Jun; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 8241969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear and nonlinear temporal interaction components of mid-latency auditory evoked potentials obtained with maximum length sequence stimulation.
    Lavoie BA; Barks A; Thornton AR
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 19967341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1656-64. PubMed ID: 2341669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional and maximum length sequences middle latency response in patients with central nervous system lesions.
    Musiek FE; Lee WW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Jun; 8(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9188074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal to noise constraints on maximum length sequence auditory brain stem responses.
    Marsh RR
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):396-400. PubMed ID: 1487100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to maximum length sequences.
    Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 8201109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal to noise ratio analysis of maximum length sequence deconvolution of overlapping evoked potentials.
    Bohórquez J; Ozdamar O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2881-8. PubMed ID: 16708946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli I: Versus Click and Tone Burst Stimuli.
    Cobb KM; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):710-723. PubMed ID: 27556529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.