These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12432507)

  • 1. Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method.
    Leutenegger AL; Génin E; Thompson EA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 12432507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general class of association tests for family-based data using weight functions.
    Liu X; Gordon D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 12652525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informative-transmission disequilibrium test (i-TDT): combined linkage and association mapping that includes unaffected offspring as well as affected offspring.
    Guo CY; Lunetta KL; DeStefano AL; Ordovas JM; Cupples LA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):115-33. PubMed ID: 17123304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical genomewide significance levels established by whole genome simulations.
    Sawcer S; Jones HB; Judge D; Visser F; Compston A; Goodfellow PN; Clayton D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9181352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gamma regression improves Haseman-Elston and variance components linkage analysis for sib-pairs.
    Barber MJ; Cordell HJ; MacGregor AJ; Andrew T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 14748009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategy for mapping minor histocompatibility genes involved in graft-versus-host disease: a novel application of discordant sib pair methodology.
    Lunetta KL; Rogus JJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 9811421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs.
    Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12933522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating parental relationship in linkage analysis of recessive traits.
    Mérette C; Ott J
    Am J Med Genet; 1996 May; 63(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 8725791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of stratifying sib-pair data in common disease linkage studies: an example using chromosome 10p14-10q11 in type 1 diabetes.
    Johnson GC; Koeleman BP; Todd JA
    Am J Med Genet; 2002 Nov; 113(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 12407706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the effect of inbreeding among founders in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Sep; 70(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 16828135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The four founding lineage hypothesis for the New World: a critical reevaluation.
    Merriwether DA; Ferrell RE
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1996 Feb; 5(1):241-6. PubMed ID: 8673292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic association tests for family data with missing parental genotypes: a comparison.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 12813729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferential testing for linkage with GENEHUNTER-MODSCORE: the impact of the pedigree structure on the null distribution of multipoint MOD scores.
    Mattheisen M; Dietter J; Knapp M; Baur MP; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 17849490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of the transmission-disequilibrium test in the presence of inbreeding.
    Génin E; Todorov AA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 11788958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parentage analysis with few contributing breeders: validation and improvement.
    Duchesne P; Meldgaard T; Berrebi P
    J Hered; 2008; 99(3):323-34. PubMed ID: 18252730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-marker family-based association analysis conditional on parental information.
    Chung RH; Martin ER
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():359-70. PubMed ID: 22307708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method for using complete and incomplete trios to identify genes related to a quantitative trait.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 15185401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.