These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12432659)
1. Do RAEs accurately measure the quality of nursing research? Richards D; Watson R Nurs Times; 2002 Oct 15-21; 98(42):17. PubMed ID: 12432659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research. Smith T Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based nursing for older people. Johnson B Nurs Times; 2000 Apr 20-26; 96(16):45. PubMed ID: 11309943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Research Excellence Framework (REF): a major impediment to free and informed debate? Nolan M; Ingleton C; Hayter M Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 18329454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Best practice initiatives in geriatric nursing: experiences from the John A. Hartford Foundation Centers of Geriatric Nursing Excellence. Harvath TA; Beck C; Flaherty-Robb M; Hartz CH; Specht J; Sullivan-Marx E; Archbold P Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(4):212-8. PubMed ID: 16890040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality. Fahy K; Fenwick J Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating research proposals. Feigenbaum K Gastroenterol Nurs; 1994 Jun; 16(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 8075166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital nursing research program: partnership of service and academia. Ravert P; Merrill KC J Prof Nurs; 2008; 24(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 18206844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grant reviews: how to do them well. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Building research capacity in nursing. Pearson A Int J Nurs Pract; 2004 Dec; 10(6):247. PubMed ID: 15544579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Building research productivity in an academic setting. Conn VS; Porter RT; McDaniel RW; Rantz MJ; Maas ML Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(5):224-31. PubMed ID: 16226566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy. Hartling L; Bond K; Santaguida PL; Viswanathan M; Dryden DM J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 21531537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meeting of minds. Crouch D Nurs Times; 2002 Oct 15-21; 98(42):22-5. PubMed ID: 12432660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Henly SJ; Dougherty MC Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidance for managing a research grant. Selby-Harrington ML; Donat PL; Hibbard HD Nurs Res; 1993; 42(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 8424070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]