265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12433761)
21. Effectiveness and cost of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a population screening program.
Wilmink AB; Quick CR; Hubbard CS; Day NE
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 38(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12844092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Changes to the Surveillance Intervals in the UK Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme.
Sweeting MJ; Marshall J; Glover M; Nasim A; Bown MJ
Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 33641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: do the benefits outweigh the costs?
Mason JM; Wakeman AP; Drummond MF; Crump BJ
J Public Health Med; 1993 Jun; 15(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 8353005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What is the role of screening in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Dabare D; Lo TT; McCormack DJ; Kung VW
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 14(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 22268069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and rescreening in men in a modern context: evaluation of a hypothetical cohort using a decision analytical model.
Søgaard R; Laustsen J; Lindholt JS
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4276. PubMed ID: 22767630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.
Ball BZ; Jiang B; Mehndiratta P; Stukenborg GJ; Upchurch GR; Meschia JF; Worrall BB; Southerland AM
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 64(3):811-818.e3. PubMed ID: 27565600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial).
Michaels JA; Campbell WB; Brazier JE; Macintyre JB; Palfreyman SJ; Ratcliffe J; Rigby K
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Apr; 10(13):1-196, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16707070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effectiveness of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on 7-year results from the United Kingdom Collaborative ECMO Trial.
Petrou S; Bischof M; Bennett C; Elbourne D; Field D; McNally H
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):1640-9. PubMed ID: 16651318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Jan; 23(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11748949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group.
Gray A; Raikou M; McGuire A; Fenn P; Stevens R; Cull C; Stratton I; Adler A; Holman R; Turner R
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7246):1373-8. PubMed ID: 10818026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term Cost-effectiveness in the Veterans Affairs Open vs Endovascular Repair Study of Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lederle FA; Stroupe KT; Kyriakides TC; Ge L; Freischlag JA;
JAMA Surg; 2016 Dec; 151(12):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 27627802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Schmidt T; Mühlberger N; Chemelli-Steingruber IE; Strasak A; Kofler B; Chemelli A; Siebert U
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 20563953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The cost-effectiveness of early surgery versus watchful waiting in the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Katz DA; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 1994 Jun; 19(6):980-90; discussion 990-1. PubMed ID: 8201717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Combination with Medical Intervention in Patients with Small Aneurysms.
Zarrouk M; Lundqvist A; Holst J; Troëng T; Gottsäter A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 51(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 26952345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shoulder acute pain in primary health care: is retraining GPs effective? The SAPPHIRE randomized trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
McKenna C; Bojke L; Manca A; Adebajo A; Dickson J; Helliwell P; Morton V; Russell I; Torgerson D; Watson J
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2009 May; 48(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 19258378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Q-TWiST and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a High Deliberate Practice Volume Center.
Canning P; Tawfick W; Kamel K; Hynes N; Sultan S
Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 56():163-174. PubMed ID: 30476604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mass screening on abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 60 to 65 years in The Netherlands. Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness using a Markov model.
Boll AP; Severens JL; Verbeek AL; van der Vliet JA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 26(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 12819652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care.
Speight PM; Palmer S; Moles DR; Downer MC; Smith DH; Henriksson M; Augustovski F
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Apr; 10(14):1-144, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16707071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
J Vasc Surg; 2005 May; 41(5):741-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 15886653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms has a positive clinical effect].
Lindholt JS; Green A; Søgaard R
Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Sep; 175(38):2170-4. PubMed ID: 24044536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
