These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12434067)

  • 41. Informed consent in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Wolf JS; Malekzadeh S; Berry JA; O'Malley BW
    Laryngoscope; 2002 May; 112(5):774-8. PubMed ID: 12150605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Informed consent: a patients' perspective.
    Burns P; Keogh I; Timon C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Jan; 119(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 15807957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Video informed consent improves knee arthroscopy patient comprehension.
    Rossi MJ; Guttmann D; MacLennan MJ; Lubowitz JH
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jun; 21(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 15944633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study.
    Smith HK; Manjaly JG; Yousri T; Upadhyay N; Taylor H; Nicol SG; Livingstone JA
    Injury; 2012 Sep; 43(9):1534-8. PubMed ID: 21782171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Understanding informed consent.
    Cericola SA
    Plast Surg Nurs; 1998; 18(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 10076458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Information and consent].
    Hoerni B
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(3):545-50; discussion 550-1. PubMed ID: 9673051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Informed consent in sinus surgery: link between demographics and patient desires.
    Taylor RJ; Chiu AG; Palmer JN; Schofield K; O'Malley BW; Wolf JS
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):826-31. PubMed ID: 15867648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of day-case gastroscopy on children and their families.
    Jimenez SG; Catto-Smith AG
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Mar; 23(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 17608638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Quality assurance of patient information--knee and hip alloplasty].
    Hindsø K; Nicolajsen K; Carlsen AW
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Aug; 156(31):4470-4. PubMed ID: 8066955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction.
    McGaughey I
    Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 15194102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improving patient-provider communication for patients having surgery: patient perceptions of a revised health literacy-based consent process.
    Miller MJ; Abrams MA; Earles B; Phillips K; McCleeary EM
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Mar; 7(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21921865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; van der Valk P; Sietses C; van den Tol P; van Leeuwen FE
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 19017681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient satisfaction with endoscopy measurement and assessment.
    Yanai H; Schushan-Eisen I; Neuman S; Novis B
    Dig Dis; 2008; 26(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 18600020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Information required to provide informed consent for endoscopy: an observational study of patients' expectations.
    Brooks AJ; Hurlstone DP; Fotheringham J; Gane J; Sanders DS; McAlindon ME
    Endoscopy; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1136-9. PubMed ID: 16281146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?
    Gitanjali B; Raveendran R; Pandian DG; Sujindra S
    J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12867683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of written information describing postoperative pain management on patient agreement with proposed treatment.
    Binhas M; Roudot-Thoraval F; Thominet D; Maison P; Marty J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):884-90. PubMed ID: 18652711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Consent to surgery in a high risk specialty: a prospective audit.
    Ellamushi HE; Khan R; Kitchen ND
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 May; 82(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10858689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and evaluation of written patient information for endoscopic procedures.
    Aabakken L; Baasland I; Lygren I; Osnes M
    Endoscopy; 1997 Jan; 29(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9083732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sharing clinical trial results with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.
    Donaldson S; Khetani N; Maniatis G; Stephens D; Wright JG
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19568019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estrogen therapy: from women's choice to women's preference.
    Lachowsky M
    Climacteric; 2002 Jun; 5 Suppl 2():46-9. PubMed ID: 12482111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.