These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12436148)

  • 1. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2002 Sep; 120(5):132-6. PubMed ID: 12436148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
    Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003144. PubMed ID: 11687041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
    Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
    Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
    Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Slesser AA; Pellino G; Shariq O; Cocker D; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP
    Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):667-76. PubMed ID: 27554096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis.
    MacRae HM; McLeod RS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Feb; 41(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9556242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
    Luglio G; Corcione F
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Nov; 23(11):1093-1095. PubMed ID: 31729620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Le KDR; Martin K; Read D
    ANZ J Surg; 2024 Apr; 94(4):604-613. PubMed ID: 38456319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
    Fingerhut A; Elhadad A; Hay JM; Lacaine F; Flamant Y
    Surgery; 1994 Sep; 116(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 8079178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.
    Jesus EC; Karliczek A; Matos D; Castro AA; Atallah AN
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Oct; 2004(4):CD002100. PubMed ID: 15495028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Nordholm-Carstensen A; Schnack Rasmussen M; Krarup PM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 30489322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stapled versus handsewn intestinal anastomosis in emergency laparotomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Naumann DN; Bhangu A; Kelly M; Bowley DM
    Surgery; 2015 Apr; 157(4):609-18. PubMed ID: 25731781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handsewn versus stapled anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: a multicenter study.
    Demetriades D; Murray JA; Chan LS; Ordoñez C; Bowley D; Nagy KK; Cornwell EE; Velmahos GC; Muñoz N; Hatzitheofilou C; Schwab CW; Rodriguez A; Cornejo C; Davis KA; Namias N; Wisner DH; Ivatury RR; Moore EE; Acosta JA; Maull KI; Thomason MH; Spain DA
    J Trauma; 2002 Jan; 52(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 11791061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mechanical versus manual anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Personal experience].
    Sciumè C; Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Romeo M; Modica G
    G Chir; 2008; 29(11-12):505-10. PubMed ID: 19068189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical approaches to colonic and rectal anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Oliveira A; Faria S; Gonçalves N; Martins A; Leão P
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Feb; 38(1):52. PubMed ID: 36814011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.
    Tabola R; Cirocchi R; Fingerhut A; Arezzo A; Randolph J; Grassi V; Binda GA; D'Andrea V; Abraha I; Popivanov G; Di Saverio S; Zbar A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Mar; 21(3):177-184. PubMed ID: 28132113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
    Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract.
    Sajid MS; Siddiqui MR; Baig MK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jan; 1():CD005477. PubMed ID: 22258964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.
    Docherty JG; McGregor JR; Akyol AM; Murray GD; Galloway DJ
    Ann Surg; 1995 Feb; 221(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 7857145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.