These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12436459)

  • 41. Validation of a questionnaire for epidemiologic studies of wheezing in infants.
    Chong Neto HJ; Rosario N; Dela Bianca AC; Solé D; Mallol J
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2007 Feb; 18(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 17295804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Prevention of childhood bronchial asthma--needs, abilities, limitations].
    Zejda JE; Brozek GM; Cholewa Z; Kowalska M
    Wiad Lek; 2002; 55 Suppl 1():599-602. PubMed ID: 15002309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improving estimates of prevalence by repeated testing.
    McClish D; Quade D
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 4005389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimation of infection prevalence and sensitivity in a stratified two-stage sampling design employing highly specific diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard.
    Miller E; Huppert A; Novikov I; Warburg A; Hailu A; Abbasi I; Freedman LS
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3349-61. PubMed ID: 26033190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Efficient study designs to assess the accuracy of screening tests.
    Irwig L; Glasziou PP; Berry G; Chock C; Mock P; Simpson JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 140(8):759-69. PubMed ID: 7942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Design of two-phase prevalence surveys of rare disorders.
    Shrout PE; Newman SC
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):549-55. PubMed ID: 2765638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimal sampling strategies for two-stage studies.
    Reilly M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Jan; 143(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 8533752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Designs for slope ratio assays.
    Buonaccorsi JP
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):875-82. PubMed ID: 3814728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The design of a panel study under an alternating Poisson process assumption.
    Albert PS; Brown CH
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):921-32. PubMed ID: 1742446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Discovering an epidemic before it has reached a certain level of prevalence.
    Metz JA; Wedel M; Angulo AF
    Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):765-70. PubMed ID: 6360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cost-efficient case-control cluster sampling designs for population-based epidemiological studies.
    Ly T; Cockburn M; Langholz B
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 26():95-105. PubMed ID: 30390934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.
    Walter SD; Irwig LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(9):923-37. PubMed ID: 3054000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An Epidemiologic Note on Verification Bias: Implications for Estimation of Rates.
    Gambino B
    J Gambl Stud; 1999; 15(3):223-232. PubMed ID: 12766460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Multipopulation survey designs: five types with seven shared aspects.
    Kish L
    Int Stat Rev; 1994 Aug; 62(2):167-86. PubMed ID: 12179592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Large sample formulae for the expected number of matches in a category matched design.
    Walter SD
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 7407316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Adaptive sampling in two-phase designs: a biomarker study for progression in arthritis.
    McIsaac MA; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2899-912. PubMed ID: 25951124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Optimal design and efficiency of two-phase case-control studies with error-prone and error-free exposure measures.
    McNamee R
    Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 15860543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [How much do you drink? sensitivity, specificity and predictive value].
    Vila Córcoles A; Llor Vilà C; Espinosa Mata E; Pardo Fonfría C
    Med Clin (Barc); 1993 Oct; 101(13):516-7. PubMed ID: 8231390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Predictive value of a questionnaire for epidemiologic studies].
    Nekrasova LI
    Vopr Onkol; 1996; 42(1):105-7. PubMed ID: 8686234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optimal two-phase sampling for comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.
    Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jun; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38867658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.