These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12437204)
1. Chilling aspects of procreation. Zwart-Hendrikx N Med Law; 2002; 21(3):567-86. PubMed ID: 12437204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives. Cahn NR Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations. Petersen SD UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce. Windsor KH Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Kass v. Kass. New York. Court of Appeals. North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 May; 696():174-82. PubMed ID: 11852946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. J.B. v. M.B. New Jersey. Supreme Court Wests Atl Report; 2001; 783():707-20. PubMed ID: 16285109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B. Issa F Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. J.B. v. M.B. New Jersey. Superior Court. Appellate Division Wests Atl Report; 2000; 751():613-20. PubMed ID: 16285110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes. Coleman CH Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Precommitment stategies [sic] for disposition of frozen embryos. Robertson JA Emory Law J; 2001; 50(4):989-1046. PubMed ID: 12956135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kass v. Kass. New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no. Sieck WA Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices. Ahnen CD Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches. Daar JF J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo. Cuva AJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction. Waldman EA Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce. King M Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction. Brenwald ML; Redeker K Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arising from the dead: challenges of posthumous procreation. Schiff AR North Carol Law Rev; 1997 Mar; 75(3):901-65. PubMed ID: 12625334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos. Rosado M New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]