BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12437851)

  • 1. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.
    Dennis GJ; Barrett RS
    Ergonomics; 2002 Aug; 45(10):671-81. PubMed ID: 12437851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1258-73. PubMed ID: 10582500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spinal stability and role of passive stiffness in dynamic squat and stoop lifts.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Oct; 10(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 17852177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of calculating cumulative lumbar spine loads.
    Sullivan D; Bryden P; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2002 Sep; 45(11):788-97. PubMed ID: 12487691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the minimum sampling rate needed to accurately quantify cumulative spine loading from digitized video.
    Andrews DM; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 14559419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating reduced bag weight as an effective risk mediator for mason tenders.
    Davis KG; Kotowski SE; Albers J; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):822-31. PubMed ID: 20206915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles.
    Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.