BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12438855)

  • 1. A comparison of the audiometric performance of bone anchored hearing aids and air conduction hearing aids.
    Bance M; Abel SM; Papsin BC; Wade P; Vendramini J
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):912-9. PubMed ID: 12438855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of audiological performance bewteen bone-anchored and conventional hearing aids].
    Iwasaki S; Hashimoto Y; Nagura M; Takebayashi S; Mizuta K; Mineta H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Nov; 108(11):1110-3. PubMed ID: 16359006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiological results of the bone-anchored hearing aid HC200: multicenter results.
    Mylanus EA; Snik FM; Cremers CW; Jorritsma FF; Verschuure H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 May; 103(5 Pt 1):368-74. PubMed ID: 8179253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids.
    Mylanus EA; van der Pouw KC; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Mar; 124(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 9525510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Audiological effect of bone-anchored hearing aid].
    Kondoh K; Matsushiro N; Satoh T; Kuramasu T; Kubo T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Dec; 108(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 16440811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.
    Lustig LR; Arts HA; Brackmann DE; Francis HF; Molony T; Megerian CA; Moore GF; Moore KM; Morrow T; Potsic W; Rubenstein JT; Srireddy S; Syms CA; Takahashi G; Vernick D; Wackym PA; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 May; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 11347635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.
    Hol MK; Spath MA; Krabbe PF; van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Apr; 130(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15096420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients?
    McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Makki FM; Bance M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.
    Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16151349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 131(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcutaneous Baha Attract system: Long-term outcomes of the French multicenter study.
    Nevoux J; Coudert C; Boulet M; Czajka C; Tavernier L; Daval M; Ayache D; Meller R; Rossetto S; Papon JF; Deveze A
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 43(6):1553-1559. PubMed ID: 30137669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bone-anchored hearing aid for patients with pure sensorineural hearing impairment: a pilot study.
    Stenfelt S; Håkansson B; Jönsson R; Granström G
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 10990016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids for bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss: a systematic review.
    Janssen RM; Hong P; Chadha NK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 22714424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids.
    van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1999 Jun; 24(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 10384840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congenital aural atresia: bone-anchored hearing aid vs. external auditory canal reconstruction.
    Bouhabel S; Arcand P; Saliba I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 22177319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.