240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12439471)
1. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system.
Yang-Powers LC; Sadowsky C; Rosenstein S; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 12439471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.
Campbell CL; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Qi R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):822-9. PubMed ID: 18068603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prospectively and retrospectively selected American Board of Orthodontics cases.
Struble BH; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):6.e1-8; discussion 6-8. PubMed ID: 20122416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A report of the ABO Resident Clinical Outcome Study (the pilot study).
Dykhouse VJ; Moffitt AH; Grubb JE; Greco PM; English JD; Briss BS; Jamieson SA; Kastrop MC; Owens SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 17110264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Mislik B; Konstantonis D; Katsadouris A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 26827982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003.
Knierim K; Roberts WE; Hartsfield J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):648-55, 655.e1-3. PubMed ID: 17110263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program.
Pinskaya YB; Hsieh TJ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 15520685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system.
Detterline DA; Isikbay SC; Brizendine EJ; Kula KS
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):528-32. PubMed ID: 20050748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized dynamic occlusal analysis and its correlation with static characters in post-orthodontic patients using the T-Scan system and the ABO objective grading system.
Wang M; Liu L; Ma X; Jin X; Zhang Z; Jia X; Fan J; Tang H; Li Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):312. PubMed ID: 37217888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for assessing the treatment outcomes of Chinese patients.
Song GY; Baumrind S; Zhao ZH; Ding Y; Bai YX; Wang L; He H; Shen G; Li WR; Wu WZ; Ren C; Weng XR; Geng Z; Xu TM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 23992811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.
Cordua T; Ursini R; Giuliante L; Deli R
Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 20545087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Nett BC; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):444-50; quiz 516. PubMed ID: 15821689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between pretreatment case complexity and orthodontic clinical outcomes determined by the American Board of Orthodontics criteria.
Cansunar HA; Uysal T
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):974-9. PubMed ID: 24694016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term occlusal changes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics' model grading system.
Aszkler RM; Preston CB; Saltaji H; Tabbaa S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24485731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical use of the ABO-Scoring Index: reliability and subtraction frequency.
Lieber WS; Carlson SK; Baumrind S; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 14580024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
