These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12439473)

  • 1. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.
    Firestone AR; Beck FM; Beglin FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 12439473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Keeling SD; Yurkiewicz L; Taylor MG; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 10456600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need.
    Beglin FM; Firestone AR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Kuthy RA; Wade D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Sep; 120(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 11552122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States.
    Younis JW; Vig KW; Rinchuse DJ; Weyant RJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 25(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 9355772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
    DeGuzman L; Bahiraei D; Vig KW; Vig PS; Weyant RJ; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7847276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].
    Grzywacz I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 16871750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions.
    Arruda AO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 18984400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.
    Chalabi O; Preston CB; Al-Jewair TS; Tabbaa S
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 26999888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists.
    Kuroda S; Fuji A; Sugie M; Uoi S; Kondo R; Ando R; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 20197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN).
    Fox NA; Daniels C; Gilgrass T
    Br Dent J; 2002 Aug; 193(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 12222910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of need for orthodontic treatment for mandibular protrusion in Japan.
    Murakami T; Fujii A; Kawabata Y; Takakura H; Yamaue R; Balam TA; Kuroda S; Kawanabe N; Kamioka H; Yamashiro T
    Acta Med Okayama; 2013; 67(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 24145727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.
    Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 10327742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need.
    Firestone AR; Beck FM; Beglin FM; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11858159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity.
    Liu S; Oh H; Chambers DW; Baumrind S; Xu T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Aug; 20(3):140-145. PubMed ID: 28670875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of two occlusal indices for determining orthodontic treatment needs of patients treated in a public university in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
    Costa RN; Abreu MH; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN
    Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Mar; 27(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 21519708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the complexity and treatment outcome components of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON).
    Savastano NJ; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12970657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.