275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12439479)
1. Effects of vertical chincap therapy on the mandibular morphology in open-bite patients.
Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan A; Meral O; Taner-Sarisoy L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 12439479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment effects of bonded spurs associated with high-pull chincup therapy in the treatment of patients with anterior open bite.
Cassis MA; de Almeida RR; Janson G; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; de Almeida MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 22999672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of posterior bite-plane on dentoskeletal changes in skeletal open-bite malocclusion.
Meibodi SE; Fatahi Meybodi S; Samadi AH
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 19915269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior open bite treated with a palatal crib and high-pull chin cup therapy. A prospective randomized study.
Torres F; Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Pedrin F; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 17101701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
Kim KR; Muhl ZF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Schulz SO; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18174072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative long term post-treatment changes in hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 patients with early cervical traction treatment.
Junkin JB; Andria LM
Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11843274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
