These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12439585)
1. New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Choi BG; Kim HH; Kim EN; Kim BS; Han JY; Yoo SS; Park SH Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):3018-22. PubMed ID: 12439585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction. Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study. Knogler T; Homolka P; Hörnig M; Leithner R; Langs G; Waitzbauer M; Pinker-Domenig K; Leitner S; Helbich TH Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1575-81. PubMed ID: 26373754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical application of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography [CE-MRM] by an algorithm combining morphological and enhancement patterns. Potente G; Messineo D; Maggi C; Savelli S Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19095407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions. Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Kuzmiak CM; Millnamow GA; Qaqish B; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Brown ME Acad Radiol; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1378-82. PubMed ID: 12553348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for breast disease diagnosis]. Wang Q; Hu GD; Kuang J; Li JM Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 29(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 19246303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination. Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; Weyler J; De Schepper A Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1363-70. PubMed ID: 15045522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast]. Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW; Smith A; Drew PJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Feb; 29(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12559074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions. Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Dominelli V; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17203383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]