137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1244053)
1. HMO regulations issued for Section 1310. Proposed dual choice regs leave unanswered questions.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Mar; 29(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 1244053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Labor and HEW reach impasse over proposed collective bargaining limitations in HMO regs.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 May; 29(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 1244044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HEW doesn't expect strict compliance with HMO law.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Oct; 31(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 1037577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed amendments to HMO dual choice rules.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1979 Sep; 34(3):12-3, 99. PubMed ID: 10277981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HMO's and the employer.
McLeod WJ
J Occup Med; 1975 Oct; 17(10):632-4. PubMed ID: 1185288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase in of HMO coverage will affect dual choice.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Mar; 29(9):8, 65. PubMed ID: 1244054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Jointly managed funds will be faced with major problems when HMO act is implemented.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 May; 29(11):18, 22. PubMed ID: 1244037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sifting through the many health care alternatives.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1986 Jul; 41(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 10277457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed dual choice regs finally issued; most important (and controversial) part of HMO Act.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Apr; 29(10):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10277965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Final HMO qualification regs out; dual-choice next.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Sep; 30(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 1244035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minnesota sets minimum standards for health insurance plans; mandates HMO dual-choice clause.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Jun; 30(12):44-5. PubMed ID: 1037553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HMO conference finds activated employers cautiously moving to implement choice.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Oct; 31(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 1037576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public Health Service--Health maintenance organizations; employees' health benefits plans. Final regulations.
Fed Regist; 1980 Oct; 45(213):72512-22. PubMed ID: 10248825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speakers urge acceptance of HMOs by employers.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Mar; 30(9):54. PubMed ID: 1037527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed regs on dual choice provision of HMO Act elicit a wide variety of responses and comments.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Jun; 29(12):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10277970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Six states mandate HMO dual choice for employees.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):40. PubMed ID: 10304844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the HMO Act good for employers?
Peres A
Bus Health; 1988 Feb; 5(4):8-13. PubMed ID: 10285635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HMO appeal. Could you get more care for your cash?
Brazil JH
Manage World; 1985 Mar; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 10270396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The "selling" of an HMO.
Van Bell RJ
Bus Health; 1984; 1(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 10265688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HMO-employer contracts.
Krasner W
Group Health J; 1983; 4(2):16-23. PubMed ID: 10262250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
