246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12441265)
1. Epirubicin versus CMF as adjuvant therapy for stage I and II breast cancer: a prospective randomised study.
Colozza M; Bisagni G; Mosconi AM; Gori S; Boni C; Sabbatini R; Frassoldati A; Passalacqua R; Bian AR; Rodinò C; Rondini E; Algeri R; Di Sarra S; De Angelis V; Cocconi G; Tonato M
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Nov; 38(17):2279-88. PubMed ID: 12441265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.
Cameron D; Morden JP; Canney P; Velikova G; Coleman R; Bartlett J; Agrawal R; Banerji J; Bertelli G; Bloomfield D; Brunt AM; Earl H; Ellis P; Gaunt C; Gillman A; Hearfield N; Laing R; Murray N; Couper N; Stein RC; Verrill M; Wardley A; Barrett-Lee P; Bliss JM;
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jul; 18(7):929-945. PubMed ID: 28600210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.
Piccart MJ; Di Leo A; Beauduin M; Vindevoghel A; Michel J; Focan C; Tagnon A; Ries F; Gobert P; Finet C; Closon-Dejardin MT; Dufrane JP; Kerger J; Liebens F; Beauvois S; Bartholomeus S; Dolci S; Lobelle JP; Paesmans M; Nogaret JM
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Jun; 19(12):3103-10. PubMed ID: 11408507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) vs CMF in early breast cancer: results with over 7 years median follow-up from the randomised phase III NEAT/BR9601 trials.
Earl HM; Hiller L; Dunn JA; Vallier AL; Bowden SJ; Jordan SD; Blows F; Munro A; Bathers S; Grieve R; Spooner DA; Agrawal R; Fernando I; Brunt AM; O'Reilly SM; Crawford SM; Rea DW; Simmonds P; Mansi JL; Stanley A; McAdam K; Foster L; Leonard RC; Twelves CJ; Cameron D; Bartlett JM; Pharoah P; Provenzano E; Caldas C; Poole CJ;
Br J Cancer; 2012 Oct; 107(8):1257-67. PubMed ID: 23047592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil versus paclitaxel followed by epirubicin and vinorelbine in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer.
Boccardo F; Amadori D; Guglielmini P; Sismondi P; Farris A; Agostara B; Gambi A; Catalano G; Faedi M; Rubagotti A
Oncology; 2010; 78(3-4):274-81. PubMed ID: 20530973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-intensified epirubicin versus standard-dose epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by CMF in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: results of a randomised trial (GABG-IV E-93) - the German Adjuvant Breast Cancer Group.
Eiermann W; Graf E; Ataseven B; Conrad B; Hilfrich J; Massinger-Biebl H; Vescia S; Loibl S; von Minckwitz G; Schumacher M; Kaufmann M;
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19879750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with rotational CMF, epirubicin and vincristine as primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma.
Cocconi G; Di Blasio B; Boni C; Bisagni G; Ceci G; Rondini E; Bella M; Leonardi F; Savoldi L; Camisa R; Bruzzi P
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 12124820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term benefit of high-dose epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: 15-year efficacy results of the Belgian multicentre study.
de Azambuja E; Paesmans M; Beauduin M; Vindevoghel A; Cornez N; Finet C; Ries F; Closon-Dejardin MT; Kerger J; Gobert P; Focan C; Tagnon A; Dolci S; Nogaret JM; di Leo A; Piccart-Gebhart MJ
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Feb; 27(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 19103732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study.
Ackland SP; Anton A; Breitbach GP; Colajori E; Tursi JM; Delfino C; Efremidis A; Ezzat A; Fittipaldo A; Kolaric K; Lopez M; Viaro D;
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Feb; 19(4):943-53. PubMed ID: 11181656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.
Levine MN; Pritchard KI; Bramwell VH; Shepherd LE; Tu D; Paul N;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(22):5166-70. PubMed ID: 16051958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized phase 2 study comparing EC or CMF versus nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for nonfrail elderly patients with moderate to high-risk early breast cancer (ICE II-GBG 52).
von Minckwitz G; Conrad B; Reimer T; Decker T; Eidtmann H; Eiermann W; Hackmann J; Möbus V; Marmé F; Potenberg J; Stickeler E; Simon E; Thomssen C; Huober J; Denkert C; Alfer J; Jackisch C; Nekljudova V; Burchardi N; Loibl S;
Cancer; 2015 Oct; 121(20):3639-48. PubMed ID: 26111104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial.
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jul; 94(14):1054-65. PubMed ID: 12122096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Levine MN; Bramwell VH; Pritchard KI; Norris BD; Shepherd LE; Abu-Zahra H; Findlay B; Warr D; Bowman D; Myles J; Arnold A; Vandenberg T; MacKenzie R; Robert J; Ottaway J; Burnell M; Williams CK; Tu D
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):2651-8. PubMed ID: 9704715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer.
Amadori D; Silvestrini R; De Lena M; Boccardo F; Rocca A; Scarpi E; Schittulli F; Brandi M; Maltoni R; Serra P; Ponzone R; Biglia N; Gianni L; Tienghi A; Valerio MR; Bonginelli P; Amaducci L; Faedi M; Baldini E; Paradiso A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21132360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac assessment of early breast cancer patients 18 years after treatment with cyclophosphamide-, methotrexate-, fluorouracil- or epirubicin-based chemotherapy.
de Azambuja E; Ameye L; Diaz M; Vandenbossche S; Aftimos P; Bejarano Hernández S; Shih-Li C; Delhaye F; Focan C; Cornez N; Vindevoghel A; Beauduin M; Lemort M; Paesmans M; Suter T; Piccart-Gebhart M
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 51(17):2517-24. PubMed ID: 26321502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel Followed by Capecitabine As Adjuvant Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results From the GEICAM/2003-10 Study.
Martín M; Ruiz Simón A; Ruiz Borrego M; Ribelles N; Rodríguez-Lescure Á; Muñoz-Mateu M; González S; Margelí Vila M; Barnadas A; Ramos M; Del Barco Berron S; Jara C; Calvo L; Martínez-Jáñez N; Mendiola Fernández C; Rodríguez CA; Martínez de Dueñas E; Andrés R; Plazaola A; de la Haba-Rodríguez J; López-Vega JM; Adrover E; Ballesteros AI; Santaballa A; Sánchez-Rovira P; Baena-Cañada JM; Casas M; del Carmen Cámara M; Carrasco EM; Lluch A
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(32):3788-95. PubMed ID: 26416999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.
Baldini E; Gardin G; Giannessi PG; Evangelista G; Roncella M; Prochilo T; Collecchi P; Rosso R; Lionetto R; Bruzzi P; Mosca F; Conte PF
Ann Oncol; 2003 Feb; 14(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12562649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Type 1 receptor tyrosine kinase profiles identify patients with enhanced benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial.
Bartlett JM; Munro A; Cameron DA; Thomas J; Prescott R; Twelves CJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Nov; 26(31):5027-35. PubMed ID: 18768436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial.
Watanabe T; Sano M; Takashima S; Kitaya T; Tokuda Y; Yoshimoto M; Kohno N; Nakagami K; Iwata H; Shimozuma K; Sonoo H; Tsuda H; Sakamoto G; Ohashi Y
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19204202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--outcome on prognosis.
Untch M; von Minckwitz G; Konecny GE; Conrad U; Fett W; Kurzeder C; Lück HJ; Stickeler E; Urbaczyk H; Liedtke B; Beckmann MW; Salat C; Harbeck N; Müller V; Schmidt M; Hasmüller S; Lenhard M; Nekljudova V; Lebeau A; Loibl S; Fasching PA;
Ann Oncol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 21382868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
