These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12441588)

  • 1. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.
    Reneman MF; Jaegers SM; Westmaas M; Göeken LN
    Work; 2002; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12441588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.
    James C; Mackenzie L; Capra M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(19-20):1797-804. PubMed ID: 21244335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2354-60. PubMed ID: 16344035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1365-70. PubMed ID: 17023247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.
    Schapmire DW; St James JD; Townsend R; Feeler L
    Work; 2011; 40(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22130062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation.
    Gross DP; Battié MC
    Phys Ther; 2002 Apr; 82(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 11922852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Therapists' ability to identify safe maximum lifting in low back pain patients during functional capacity evaluation.
    Smith RL
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 May; 19(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 8199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
    van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic lifting capacity: the relationship between peak force and weight as an indicator of effort.
    Hazard RG; Reeves V; Weisman G; Fleming BC; Pope MH
    J Spinal Disord; 1991 Mar; 4(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 1839668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the 10-point Manual Muscle Test (MMT) of strength in children with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM).
    Jain M; Smith M; Cintas H; Koziol D; Wesley R; Harris-Love M; Lovell D; Rider LG; Hicks J
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2006; 26(3):5-17. PubMed ID: 16966313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance.
    Lechner DE; Jackson JR; Roth DL; Straaton KV
    J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):997-1004. PubMed ID: 7823222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the JobFit System Pre-Employment Functional Assessment Tool.
    Legge J; Burgess-Limerick R
    Work; 2007; 28(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 17522451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation.
    Reneman MF; Fokkens AS; Dijkstra PU; Geertzen JH; Groothoff JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):E40-6. PubMed ID: 15644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro's functional capacity evaluation.
    Scheel C; Mecham J; Zuccarello V; Mattes R
    Work; 2018; 60(3):465-473. PubMed ID: 30040785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized voluntary force measurement in a lower extremity rehabilitation robot.
    Bolliger M; Banz R; Dietz V; Lünenburger L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 5():23. PubMed ID: 18957092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest reliability on nine tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation.
    Tuckwell NL; Straker L; Barrett TE
    Work; 2002; 19(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 12547969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopedic impairments.
    Brunnekreef JJ; van Uden CJ; van Moorsel S; Kooloos JG
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2005 Mar; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15774012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
    Trippolini MA; Dijkstra PU; Jansen B; Oesch P; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
    J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 24(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 23975060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation.
    Isernhagen SJ; Hart DL; Matheson LM
    Work; 1999; 12(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 12441429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of a method for analyzing three-dimensional knee kinematics during gait.
    Labbe DR; Hagemeister N; Tremblay M; de Guise J
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jul; 28(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 18155553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.