These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12442598)

  • 1. Evaluation of a device for objective determination of cervical consistency: a pilot study of device's validity on uterine specimens obtained by total abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disease.
    Predanic M
    J Perinat Med; 2002; 30(5):364-6. PubMed ID: 12442598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Nava A; Zeck W; Eder M; Bajka M; Cacho F; Lang U; Holzapfel GA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():186-202. PubMed ID: 17363446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases? A meta-analysis.
    Gimbel H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 17364274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Monitoring cervical dilatation by impedance].
    Salvat J; Lassen M; Sauze C; Baud S; Salvat F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 1401774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presence of sensory nerve corpuscles in the human corpus and cervix uteri during pregnancy and labor as revealed by immunohistochemistry.
    Tingaker BK; Ekman-Ordeberg G; Forsgren S
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2006 Aug; 4():45. PubMed ID: 16938139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Jabareen M; Sultan L; Bajka M; Lang U; Zimmermann R; Holzapfel GA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S77-81. PubMed ID: 19285777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aspiration technique-based device is more reliable in cervical stiffness assessment than digital palpation.
    Badir S; Bernardi L; Feijó Delgado F; Quack Loetscher K; Hebisch G; Hoesli I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jul; 20(1):391. PubMed ID: 32631265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of examination of the entire uterine cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer.
    Nayar AG; Cross PA; Bulmer JN; Deen S; El-Sherif A
    J Clin Pathol; 2008 May; 61(5):621-2. PubMed ID: 18006669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of uterine shape by geometric means.
    Hasson HM; Dershin H
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jan; 2(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 12278590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Total hysterectomy in cases with abnormal swelling of the uterine cervix].
    Maki M; Sakuraba H
    Shujutsu; 1970 Oct; 24(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 5474065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results.
    Gimbel H; Zobbe V; Andersen BM; Filtenborg T; Gluud C; Tabor A
    BJOG; 2003 Dec; 110(12):1088-98. PubMed ID: 14664880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens.
    Jha R; Pant AD; Jha A; Adhikari RC; Sayami G
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(163):283-90. PubMed ID: 17334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does supracervical hysterectomy provide more support to the vaginal apex than total abdominal hysterectomy?
    Rahn DD; Marker AC; Corton MM; Roshanravan SM; McIntire DD; Schaffer JI; Wai CY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):650.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18060966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients.
    Garfield RE; Maner WL; Maul H; Saade GR
    BJOG; 2005 Mar; 112 Suppl 1():103-8. PubMed ID: 15715606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology among women without previous vaginal delivery.
    Tohic AL; Dhainaut C; Yazbeck C; Hallais C; Levin I; Madelenat P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 111(4):829-37. PubMed ID: 18378741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the cervix in non-pregnant and pregnant women.
    Gandhi SV; Walker D; Milnes P; Mukherjee S; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16517044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy of the uterine cervix during cervical ripening.
    Baños A; Wolf M; Grawe C; Stahel M; Haensse D; Fink D; Hornung R
    Lasers Surg Med; 2007 Sep; 39(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 17886282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical biopsy and excision procedure specimens lack sufficient predictive value for lymph-vascular space invasion seen at hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Bidus MA; Caffrey AS; You WB; Amezcua CA; Chernofsky MR; Barner R; Seidman J; Rose GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 199(2):151.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18674657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.