BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12443987)

  • 21. On the validity of interblock averaging of P300 in clinical settings.
    Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT; García-Larrea L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Nov; 34(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 10576395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory event-related potentials in fetal alcohol syndrome and Down's syndrome children.
    Kaneko WM; Ehlers CL; Philips EL; Riley EP
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1996 Feb; 20(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 8651459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceiving rhythm where none exists: event-related potential (ERP) correlates of subjective accenting.
    Potter DD; Fenwick M; Abecasis D; Brochard R
    Cortex; 2009 Jan; 45(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 19027894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory and visual P300 reflecting cognitive improvement in patients with schizophrenia with quetiapine: a pilot study.
    Park EJ; Han SI; Jeon YW
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2010 May; 34(4):674-80. PubMed ID: 20304022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets.
    Mazaheri A; Picton TW
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 15922161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minipig negative slow wave demonstrates target/nontarget differences in P300 paradigm.
    Arnfred SM; Lind NM; Moustgaard A; Hansen AK; Gjedde A
    Neuroimage; 2003 Sep; 20(1):587-90. PubMed ID: 14527619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory event-related potentials in the squirrel monkey: parallels to human late wave responses.
    Neville HJ; Foote SL
    Brain Res; 1984 Apr; 298(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 6722547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.
    Sugg MJ; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Nov; 41(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 8608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task.
    Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 17343708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modification of sudden onset auditory ERP by involuntary attention to visual stimuli.
    Oray S; Lu ZL; Dawson ME
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Mar; 43(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 11850087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Progress of study in auditory event-related potentials of novel events].
    Liu B; Zhang Z; Liu Z; Wang M; Zhu Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):705-8. PubMed ID: 17713294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes of auditory stimulus processing in sevoflurane-induced sedation.
    Kim JW; Kim PJ; Kim HG; Shin TJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Apr; 698():121-125. PubMed ID: 30639398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Single-sweep analysis of the theta frequency band during an auditory oddball task.
    Yordanova J; Kolev V
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jan; 35(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 9499712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive evoked potentials to anticipated oesophageal stimulus in humans: quantitative assessment of the cognitive aspects of visceral perception.
    Hollerbach S; Fitzpatrick D; Shine G; Kamath MV; Upton AR; Tougas G
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 1999 Feb; 11(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10087533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional rather than sensory differences characterize auditory processing in Williams syndrome.
    Jacobs M; Dykens EM; Key AP
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Mar; 121():24-37. PubMed ID: 29353707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related potentials of the rat during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms.
    Shinba T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 104(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 9344081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of the time locking of EEG waves to the generation of the auditory P300.
    Rodionov V; Sohmer H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):71-105. PubMed ID: 15485131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Developmental changes of auditory event-related potentials under involuntary and voluntary attention towards deviant stimuli in school children from the north region].
    Rozhkov VP; Sergeeva EG; Soroko SI
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2008 Nov; 94(11):1240-58. PubMed ID: 19140301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.