These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effectiveness of graph-based and fingerprint-based similarity measures for virtual screening of 2D chemical structure databases. Raymond JW; Willett P J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Jan; 16(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 12197666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representation of chemical information in OASIS centralized 3D database for existing chemicals. Nikolov N; Grancharov V; Stoyanova G; Pavlov T; Mekenyan O J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2537-51. PubMed ID: 17125194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved Deep Learning Based Method for Molecular Similarity Searching Using Stack of Deep Belief Networks. Nasser M; Salim N; Hamza H; Saeed F; Rabiu I Molecules; 2020 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 33383976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of similarity measures for searching the dictionary of natural products database. Whittle M; Willett P; Klaffke W; van Noort P J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 12653508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemical similarity searches using latent semantic structural indexing (LaSSI) and comparison to TOPOSIM. Hull RD; Fluder EM; Singh SB; Nachbar RB; Kearsley SK; Sheridan RP J Med Chem; 2001 Apr; 44(8):1185-91. PubMed ID: 11312918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. Matter H J Med Chem; 1997 Apr; 40(8):1219-29. PubMed ID: 9111296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Tanimoto Similarity Value Distributions and Predicting Search Results. Vogt M; Bajorath J Mol Inform; 2017 Jul; 36(7):. PubMed ID: 28032955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments. Ebalunode JO; Zheng W J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similarity-based descriptors (SIBAR)--a tool for safe exchange of chemical information? Kaiser D; Zdrazil B; Ecker GF J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2005; 19(9-10):687-92. PubMed ID: 16249834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings. Holliday JD; Hu CY; Willett P Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2002 Mar; 5(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 11966424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bit silencing in fingerprints enables the derivation of compound class-directed similarity metrics. Wang Y; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1754-9. PubMed ID: 18698839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]