378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12444879)
1. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hand volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement.
Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Hill CJ; Hernandez T; Greenshner A; Diep H
Lymphology; 2006 Jun; 39(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16910100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foot volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement.
Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Litwin B; Pfister S
Lymphology; 2005 Mar; 38(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15856683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of volume displacement versus circumferential arm measurements for lymphoedema: implications for the SNAC trial.
Tewari N; Gill PG; Bochner MA; Kollias J
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):889-93. PubMed ID: 18959643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative bioimpedance spectroscopy for the assessment of lymphoedema.
Ward LC; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Oct; 117(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 19082708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardised measurements used to order compression garments can be used to calculate arm volumes to evaluate lymphoedema treatment.
Brorson H; Höijer P
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2012 Dec; 46(6):410-5. PubMed ID: 23157502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
