119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12445250)
1. Influences on the risk of recurrent high grade cervical abnormality.
Mitchell H; Hocking J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 12445250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy for high-grade dysplasia.
Livasy CA; Moore DT; Van Le L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 15291995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk.
Herbert A; Smith JA
Cytopathology; 1999 Jun; 10(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 10390064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of persistent or recurrent cervical neoplasia in patients with 'pure' adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) or mixed AIS and high-grade cervical squamous neoplasia (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN 2/3)): a population-based study.
Codde E; Munro A; Stewart C; Spilsbury K; Bowen S; Codde J; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Cohen PA
BJOG; 2018 Jan; 125(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28678394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 and Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Cervix: Recurrence of CIN 3 and AIS of Cervix.
Swift BE; Wang L; Jembere N; Kupets R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 32384365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.
Wilkinson TM; Sykes PH; Simcock B; Petrich S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):769.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25582099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A descriptive analysis of prevalent vs incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 following minor cytologic abnormalities.
Castle PE; Gravitt PE; Wentzensen N; Schiffman M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Aug; 138(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 22904136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for early cytologic abnormalities after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Dietrich CS; Yancey MK; Miyazawa K; Williams DL; Farley J
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 11814494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins.
Reich O; Pickel H; Lahousen M; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 11239650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater in women with mildly abnormal Pap smears.
Boardman LA; Adams AE; Peipert JF
J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):891-6. PubMed ID: 12497676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): histological results and recurrence after a loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Nogara PR; Manfroni LA; Consolaro ME
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):965-71. PubMed ID: 21052702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study.
Kocken M; Helmerhorst TJ; Berkhof J; Louwers JA; Nobbenhuis MA; Bais AG; Hogewoning CJ; Zaal A; Verheijen RH; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2011 May; 12(5):441-50. PubMed ID: 21530398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting outcome after incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Paraskevaidis E; Kalantaridou SN; Paschopoulos M; Zikopoulos K; Diakomanolis E; Dalkalitsis N; Makrydimas G; Pappa L; Malamou-Mitsi V; Agnantis NJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 14658599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study.
Melnikow J; McGahan C; Sawaya GF; Ehlen T; Coldman A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 May; 101(10):721-8. PubMed ID: 19436026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among young women with abnormal screening cytology.
Massad SL; Markwell S; Cejtin HE; Collins Y
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Oct; 9(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 16205193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinicopathologic outcomes of laser conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia.
dos Santos L; Odunsi K; Lele S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 15171305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of high risk factors associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in married women aged 25 - 54 years in Beijing between 2007 - 2008].
Li CD; Zhang WY; Wu MH; Zhang SW; Zhou BL; Zhu L; Pan J; Wang JD
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21176557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Underlying histopathology of HIV-infected women with squamous cell abnormalities on cervical cytology.
Suwankanta N; Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Siriaunkgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 18990018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
