These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12445986)

  • 1. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations.
    Yogev Y; Horowitz E; Ben-Haroush A; Chen R; Kaplan B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Dec; 79(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 12445986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
    Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successful vaginal delivery after external cephalic version (ECV): does time interval from ECV to delivery make a difference? A multicenter study.
    Cahan T; Levin G; Moran O; Weill Y; Pollack R; Meyer R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 32749534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term.
    Caukwell S; Joels LA; Kyle PM; Mills MS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 12521413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
    Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
    Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.
    Say R; Thomson R; Robson S; Exley C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 23324533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External cephalic version: a clinical experience.
    O'Grady JP; Veille JC; Holland RL; Burry KA
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 3537268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term.
    Ezra Y; Elram T; Plotkin V; Elchalal U
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 May; 90(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 10767512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
    Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation.
    Cobec IM; Varzaru VB; Kövendy T; Kuban L; Eftenoiu AE; Moatar AE; Rempen A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 36363576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [External cephalic version at term].
    Zwoliński J; Pawłowska A; Bańkowska EM; Lisawa J; Leibschang J; Bogdan C
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2003; 7(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 13130172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the Cesarean section rate: experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France.
    Birene B; Ishaque U; Chrusciel J; Bonneau S; Gabriel R; Graesslin O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):443-454. PubMed ID: 32895742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.