203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12446890)
1. Research ethics. Planned misconduct surveys meet stiff resistance.
Holden C
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5598):1549. PubMed ID: 12446890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
Teitelbaum SL
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits.
Korn D
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tie funding to research integrity.
Titus S; Bosch X
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics. Global research integrity training.
Steneck NH
Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):552-3. PubMed ID: 23641099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Plagiarize or perish?
Ready T
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research integrity.
Thomas A
Nature; 1995 Jan; 373(6509):10. PubMed ID: 7800026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The frustrations of scientific misconduct.
Kassirer JP
N Engl J Med; 1993 Jun; 328(22):1634-6. PubMed ID: 8387639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Your own desktop crime lab.
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can't hide your lying eyes.
Wadman M
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Current ethical issues in research.
Horowitz HS
J Am Coll Dent; 1990; 57(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 2174932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Second guessing. Is more oversight needed to curb scientific cheating?
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1991 Jun; 264(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1650032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing research integrity.
Richman VV; Richman A
CMAJ; 2007 Aug; 177(4):375. PubMed ID: 17698830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
