BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12447221)

  • 1. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel.
    Young HL; Suzuki S
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10477999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation.
    Graf K; Johnson GH; Mehl A; Rammelsberg P
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 11931136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?
    Suzuki S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; van Putten M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of toothbrush and generalized wear of luting materials.
    Suzuki S; Minami H
    Am J Dent; 2005 Oct; 18(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 16335038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wear resistance of resin cements.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Shinkai K
    Am J Dent; 1995 Apr; 8(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7546484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.