These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12447221)

  • 21. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy.
    Sarafianou A; Seimenis I; Papadopoulos T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 18456049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro.
    Göhring TN; Besek MJ; Schmidlin PR
    J Dent; 2002; 30(2-3):119-27. PubMed ID: 12381412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resistance of core materials against torsional forces on differently conditioned titanium posts.
    Akişli I; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12447212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth.
    da Cunha MR; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 17212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro wear assessment of titanium alloy teeth.
    Ohkubo C; Shimura I; Aoki T; Hanatani S; Hosoi T; Okabe T
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 12501140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 8599594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
    Tagtekin DA; Yanikoglu FC; Bozkurt FO; Kologlu B; Sur H
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Occlusal wear of metal-free ceramic-filled polymer crowns after 2 years in service.
    Stober T; Dreyhaupt J; Lehnung U; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 18546773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.