These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impartial review is key. Crabtree G Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6900):817. PubMed ID: 12192385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims. Reich ES Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud: the system works. Schuller IK; Guentherodt G Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6900):817. PubMed ID: 12192386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Claxton LD Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct. Vences M; Zardoya R Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Misconduct finding at Bell Labs shakes physics community. Brumfiel G Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):419-21. PubMed ID: 12368818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed. Teitelbaum SL Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits. Korn D Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it? Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]