These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12448855)

  • 21. Genetic diversity and population structure of American Red Angus cattle.
    Márquez GC; Speidel SE; Enns RM; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 19783699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds.
    Gandini G; Stella A; Del Corvo M; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1790-8. PubMed ID: 24440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Founder effects, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity in four avian reintroduction programs.
    Jamieson IG
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20825445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short communication: Field fertility in Holstein bulls: Can type of breeding strategy (artificial insemination following estrus versus timed artificial insemination) alter service sire fertility?
    Batista EOS; Vieira LM; Sá Filho MF; Carvalho PD; Rivera H; Cabrera V; Wiltbank MC; Baruselli PS; Souza AH
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2010-2015. PubMed ID: 26778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inbreeding and the gene pool.
    Young CW
    J Dairy Sci; 1984 Feb; 67(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 6371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting the rate of inbreeding in populations undergoing four-path selection on genomically enhanced breeding values.
    Togashi K; Adachi K; Kurogi K; Yasumori T; Watanabe T; Toda S; Matsubara S; Hirohama K; Takahashi T; Matsuo S
    Anim Biosci; 2022 Jun; 35(6):804-813. PubMed ID: 34991226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential.
    Day SB; Bryant EH; Meffert LM
    Evolution; 2003 Jun; 57(6):1314-24. PubMed ID: 12894939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of gene editing versus conventional breeding to introgress the POLLED allele into the US dairy cattle population.
    Mueller ML; Cole JB; Sonstegard TS; Van Eenennaam AL
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 May; 102(5):4215-4226. PubMed ID: 30852022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of widespread and limited use of sexed semen on genetic progress and reproductive performance of dairy cows.
    Khalajzadeh S; Nejati-Javaremi A; Mehrbani Yeganeh H
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1398-406. PubMed ID: 22717129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using multiple objective programming in a dairy cow breeding program.
    Tozer PR; Stokes JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2782-8. PubMed ID: 11814035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Seasonal effects of semen collection and artificial insemination on dairy cow conception.
    Haugan T; Reksen O; Gröhn YT; Kommisrud E; Ropstad E; Sehested E
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Nov; 90(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16257597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of genomic selection of AI dairy sires on their likely utilization and methods to estimate fertility: a paradigm shift.
    Amann RP; DeJarnette JM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Mar; 77(5):795-817. PubMed ID: 22153268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pedigree analysis of 5 swine breeds in the United States and the implications for genetic conservation.
    Welsh CS; Stewart TS; Schwab C; Blackburn HD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 May; 88(5):1610-8. PubMed ID: 20190174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value.
    Bijma P; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):361-73. PubMed ID: 10978299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Indicators of genetic erosion in an endangered population: the Alentejana cattle breed in Portugal.
    Carolino N; Gama LT
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 17709771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inbreeding depression on semen quality in Austrian dual-purpose simmental bulls.
    Maximini L; Fuerst-Waltl B; Gredler B; Baumung R
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Feb; 46(1):e102-4. PubMed ID: 20546181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Potential genetic gains from producing bulls with only sires as parents.
    Van Raden PM; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1985 Jun; 68(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 3860522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inbreeding and reproduction in mice divergently selected for response to a dietary toxin.
    Hohenboken WD; Wagner CR; Blodgett DJ
    Theriogenology; 1998 May; 49(7):1397-407. PubMed ID: 10732076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Break-even cost of cloning in genetic improvement of dairy cattle.
    Dematawewa CM; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1136-47. PubMed ID: 9594403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.