These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12448863)

  • 1. "Cost-effectiveness" estimates result in flawed decision-making in listing drugs for reimbursement.
    West R; Borden EK; Collet JP; Rawson NS; Tonks RS
    Can J Public Health; 2002; 93(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 12448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.
    Rocchi A; Menon D; Verma S; Miller E
    Value Health; 2008; 11(4):771-83. PubMed ID: 18179658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Need for an improved submission process for listing drugs for reimbursement in Canadian provinces.
    West R; Borden EK; Collet JP; Rawson NS; Tonks RS
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2003; 10(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 14712327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation and use of economic evidence to inform cancer drug reimbursement decisions in Canada.
    Yong JH; Beca J; Hoch JS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 23322588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].
    Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.
    Anis AH; Rahman T; Schechter MT
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Jan; 13(1 Pt 2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10176146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.
    Kim ES; Kim JA; Lee EK
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Aug; 17(4):401-409. PubMed ID: 28010146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological quality of economic evaluations of new pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands.
    Hoomans T; Severens JL; van der Roer N; Delwel GO
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Mar; 30(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 22074610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unravelling drug reimbursement outcomes: a comparative study of the role of pharmacoeconomic evidence in Dutch and Swedish reimbursement decision making.
    Franken M; Nilsson F; Sandmann F; de Boer A; Koopmanschap M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):781-97. PubMed ID: 23839699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].
    Führlinger S
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):612-8. PubMed ID: 17211765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
    Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
    JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of pharmacoeconomic evaluations submitted for reimbursement in Korea.
    Yim EY; Lim SH; Oh MJ; Park HK; Gong JR; Park SE; Yi SY
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S104-10. PubMed ID: 22265055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A synthesis of drug reimbursement decision-making processes in organisation for economic co-operation and development countries.
    Barnieh L; Manns B; Harris A; Blom M; Donaldson C; Klarenbach S; Husereau D; Lorenzetti D; Clement F
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 24438723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating economic evaluations into decision-making: the Ontario experience.
    Laupacis A
    Med Care; 2005 Jul; 43(7 Suppl):15-9. PubMed ID: 16056004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of a pharmaceutical risk sharing agreement based on the purchaser's total budget.
    Zaric GS; O'brien BJ
    Health Econ; 2005 Aug; 14(8):793-803. PubMed ID: 15685669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making?
    Anell A; Persson U
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Sep; 6(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 15968561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea.
    Bae EY; Kim HJ; Lee HJ; Jang J; Lee SM; Jung Y; Yoon N; Kim TK; Kim K; Yang BM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206121. PubMed ID: 30356251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996).
    George B; Harris A; Mitchell A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1103-9. PubMed ID: 11735677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.
    Svensson M; Nilsson FO; Arnberg K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1229-36. PubMed ID: 26093889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attempt to increase the transparency of fourth hurdle implementation in Central-Eastern European middle income countries: publication of the critical appraisal methodology.
    Inotai A; Pékli M; Jóna G; Nagy O; Remák E; Kaló Z
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Sep; 12():332. PubMed ID: 22999574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.