191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12449307)
1. A concept for a biologically derived, parabolic implant design.
Holt RL; Rosenberg MM; Zinser PJ; Ganeles J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 12449307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Achieving and maintaining predictable implant esthetics through the maintenance of bone around dental implants.
Stanford CM
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Sep; 23(9 Suppl 2):13-20. PubMed ID: 12790009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics.
Gardner DM
N Y State Dent J; 2005 Apr; 71(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16013682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new concept for optimizing soft tissue integration.
Touati B; Rompen E; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(10):711-2, 714-5. PubMed ID: 16506613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.
Grunder U; Gracis S; Capelli M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Apr; 25(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15839587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.
Bakaeen L; Quinlan P; Schoolfield J; Lang NP; Cochran DL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 19537469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report.
Baumgarten H; Cocchetto R; Testori T; Meltzer A; Porter S
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 16506616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone.
Hermann F; Lerner H; Palti A
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 17563507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique.
Luongo R; Traini T; Guidone PC; Bianco G; Cocchetto R; Celletti R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):551-7. PubMed ID: 19146050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.
Becker J; Ferrari D; Mihatovic I; Sahm N; Schaer A; Schwarz F
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 19508252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report.
Degidi M; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Piattelli A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18081870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional bone and soft tissue requirements for optimizing esthetic results in compromised cases with multiple implants.
Ishikawa T; Salama M; Funato A; Kitajima H; Moroi H; Salama H; Garber D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Oct; 30(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 20814604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone level dental implant versus gingival crest level implant.
Fernandes A
Dent Today; 2011 Jun; 30(6):72-3. PubMed ID: 21761630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new implant design for optimal esthetics and retention of interproximal papillae.
Gadhia MH; Holt RL
Implant Dent; 2003; 12(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 12861885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour.
Su H; Gonzalez-Martin O; Weisgold A; Lee E
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 20664835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Light-microscopic evaluation of the dimensions of peri-implant mucosa around immediately loaded and submerged titanium implants in monkeys.
Quaranta A; Piattelli A; Scarano A; Quaranta M; Pompa G; Iezzi G
J Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 79(9):1697-703. PubMed ID: 18771371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Shibli JA; Novaes AB; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 21138355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant.
Nevins M; Nevins ML; Camelo M; Boyesen JL; Kim DM
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 18546807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants.
Pecora GE; Ceccarelli R; Bonelli M; Alexander H; Ricci JL
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 19212238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Schwarz F; Herten M; Sager M; Wieland M; Dard M; Becker J
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17137467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
