132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12449359)
1. Assessment of medical imaging and computer-assist systems: lessons from recent experience.
Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Campbell G; Metz CE; Sacks WM
Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1264-77. PubMed ID: 12449359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
Gallas BD; Brown DG
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices.
Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):641-2. PubMed ID: 17502252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anniversary paper: evaluation of medical imaging systems.
Krupinski EA; Jiang Y
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):645-59. PubMed ID: 18383686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solitary pulmonary nodule diagnosis on CT: results of an observer study.
Shah SK; McNitt-Gray MF; De Zoysa KR; Sayre JW; Kim HJ; Batra P; Behrashi A; Brown K; Greaser LE; Park JM; Roback DK; Wu C; Zaragoza E; Goldin JG; Suh RD; Brown MS; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 15831424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A probabilistic model for the MRMC method, part 1: theoretical development.
Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Barrett HH
Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1410-21. PubMed ID: 17070460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of computer aided diagnosis (CAD) in clinical imaging. Presentation of the value and current directions in CAD development in various imaging techniques based on literature review].
Kiszka K; Haduch J; Pasowicz M
Przegl Lek; 2009; 66(8):437-47. PubMed ID: 20043591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance.
Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Doi K; Nishikawa RM; Freedman M; Lo SC; Xu XW
Acad Radiol; 2002 Sep; 9(9):1036-43. PubMed ID: 12238545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19124107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities.
Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G; Metz CE; Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):605-15. PubMed ID: 11450961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hypothesis testing in noninferiority and equivalence MRMC ROC studies.
Chen W; Petrick NA; Sahiner B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1158-65. PubMed ID: 22717591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for intelligent medical systems--a new approach for finding confidence intervals.
Tilbury JB; Van Eetvelt PW; Garibaldi JM; Curnow JS; Ifeachor EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jul; 47(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10916267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electroencephalographs.
Dondelinger RM
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(5):388-91. PubMed ID: 19842771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting readers' diagnostic accuracy with a new CAD algorithm.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1412-9. PubMed ID: 21917487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.
Swaving M; van Houwelingen H; Ottes FP; Steerneman T
Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 8778532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized screening devices and performance assessment: development of a policy towards automation. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Hutchinson ML; Gahm T; Grohs HK; Gwi-Mak E; Kaufman EA; Kaufman RH; Knight BK; Koss LG; Magruder LE; Mango LJ; McCallum SM; Melamed MR; Peebles A; Richart RM; Robinowitz M; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Schenck U; Tanaka N; Topalidis T; Verhest AP; Wertlake PT; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 9479324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
