273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12449973)
1. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
Janssen ND
Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
Phillips M
Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory.
McGinnis DM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
Moss KL
Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal abuse: culpable behavior by pregnant women or parental immunity?
Smith GP
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 11652567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
Myers JE
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ACLU philosophy and the right to abuse the unborn.
Johnson PE
Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11650911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
Mathieu D
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compelled hospitalization and treatment during pregnancy: mental health statutes as models for legislation to protect children from prenatal drug and alcohol exposure.
Wilton JM
Fam Law Q; 1991; 25(2):149-70. PubMed ID: 11659420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G.: the impossibility of fetal rights and the obligations of judicial governance.
DeCoste FC
Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):725-50. PubMed ID: 12455542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State responses to substance abuse among pregnant women.
Dailard C; Nash E
Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst); 2000 Dec; (6):1-4. PubMed ID: 12134883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Criminal liability for fetal endangerment: editor's introduction.
Kleinig J
Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11650906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right of the fetus to be born free of drug addiction.
Levine M
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():45-55. PubMed ID: 11661109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnant women as fetal containers.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 3804722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
Weyrauch S
Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
Cook M
Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are fetal rights equal to infants'.
Chambers M
N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():24E. PubMed ID: 11646229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Drugs in the womb: the newest battlefield in the war on drugs.
Logli PA
Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11650908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
