These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12450458)

  • 41. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
    Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals.
    Dijkers M; Kropp GC; Esper RM; Yavuzer G; Cullen N; Bakdalieh Y
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 81(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 11807328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of performance metrics reporting in papers comparing treatments or materials/devices in four important orthopaedic journals for the year 2009.
    Bowles RJ; Mauffrey C; Seligson D
    Injury; 2011 Dec; 42(12):1480-3. PubMed ID: 21813123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multiplicity in rehabilitation research: a quantitative assessment.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):170-3. PubMed ID: 3348714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Research trends in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Ozel AT; Kottke FJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1978 Apr; 59(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 646605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Recent reliability reporting practices in Psychological Assessment: recognizing the people behind the data.
    Green CE; Chen CE; Helms JE; Henze KT
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Sep; 23(3):656-69. PubMed ID: 21517191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination.
    Tooth LR; Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 85(8):1371-6. PubMed ID: 15295769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reporting of instrument validity and reliability in selected clinical nursing journals, 1989.
    Selby-Harrington ML; Mehta SM; Jutsum V; Riportella-Muller R; Quade D
    J Prof Nurs; 1994; 10(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 8144756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A general critical appraisal tool: an evaluation of construct validity.
    Crowe M; Sheppard L
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21802686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Quality of the presentation of free research papers in the National Congress of Gastroenterology: Morelia-1997].
    Takahashi T; Remes-Troche JM; Arch-Ferrer J; Ayala-Ramírez M; Hernández-Barrios C; Gómez-Rivera F; Correa-Rovelo JM
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 1999; 64(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10532119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Negative studies published in Indian medical journals are underpowered.
    Jayakaran C; Saxena D; Yadav P
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 Jun; 48(6):490-1. PubMed ID: 21743119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Considerations about the use and misuse of Rasch analysis in rehabilitation outcome studies.
    Franchignoni F; Giordano A; Ferriero G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 45(2):289-91. PubMed ID: 19396058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical standards to assist audit in medical rehabilitation.
    Collin C
    Health Trends; 1991; 23(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 10113880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The validity of experimental evidence.
    Dibbets JM
    Anat Anz; 1990; 171(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 2080811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measures of effect size in the reporting of rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Barrett KA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Apr; 68(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 2649115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rehabilitation resources: a select list of journals.
    Frey AL; Kelly K
    Natl Netw; 1997 Nov; 22(2):suppl 4 p. following 16. PubMed ID: 10174401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part One.
    Stewart BJ; Archbold PG
    Res Nurs Health; 1992 Dec; 15(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 1448579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Barrett KA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Apr; 69(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 2331338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A plea for the use of standardized outcome measures in everyday practice.
    Dougados M
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1998 Jan; 65(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 9523378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A statistics primer. Validity and reliability.
    Greenfield ML; Kuhn JE; Wojtys EM
    Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 9617417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.