These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12450710)

  • 1. Enhanced bone integration of implants with increased surface roughness: a long term study in the sheep.
    Grizon F; Aguado E; Huré G; Baslé MF; Chappard D
    J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):195-203. PubMed ID: 12450710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The early remodeling phases around titanium implants: a histomorphometric assessment of bone quality in a 3- and 6-month study in sheep.
    Chappard D; Aguado E; Huré G; Grizon F; Basle MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 10212535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultraviolet-C irradiation to titanium implants increases peri-implant bone formation without impeding mineralization in a rabbit femur model.
    Yamazaki M; Yamada M; Ishizaki K; Sakurai K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 25645878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
    Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits.
    Suzuki K; Aoki K; Ohya K
    Bone; 1997 Dec; 21(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 9430240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of New Bone Formation and Osseointegration Around Subperiosteal Titanium Implants with Histometry and Nanoindentation.
    Claffey N; Bashara H; O'Reilly P; Polyzois I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1004-10. PubMed ID: 26394334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
    Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique.
    Nkenke E; Kloss F; Wiltfang J; Schultze-Mosgau S; Radespiel-Tröger M; Loos K; Neukam FW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 12519333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of phosphate treatment of Acid-etched implants on mineral apposition rates near implants in a dog model.
    Foley CH; Kerns DG; Hallmon WW; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Nelson CJ; Spears R; Dechow PC; Opperman LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 20369085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
    Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced bone apposition to Brazilian microrough titanium surfaces.
    Xavier SP; Ikuno KE; Tavares MG
    Braz Dent J; 2010 Jan; 21(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 20464316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone formation at titanium implants prepared with iso- and anisotropic surfaces of similar roughness: an in vivo study.
    Göransson A; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15903170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.