These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12451201)

  • 1. Is the middle between both halves?: midpoint location and segment size estimation in neglect.
    Riestra AR; Womack KB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 2002 Nov; 59(10):1580-4. PubMed ID: 12451201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of hemispatial neglect on the perception of centre.
    Olk B; Wee J; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):365-7. PubMed ID: 15177815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental analysis of factors underlying neglect in line bisection.
    Butter CM; Mark VW; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1988 Dec; 51(12):1581-3. PubMed ID: 3221227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extinction, working memory, and line bisection in spatial neglect.
    Riestra AR; Crucian GP; Burks DW; Womack KB; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 2001 Jul; 57(1):147-9. PubMed ID: 11445648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect? Analysis of perceptual and motor aspects in line bisection tasks.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Nakayama T
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Apr; 36(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 9647677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.
    McIntosh RD; Ietswaart M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():146-158. PubMed ID: 28923304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Milner and Bisiach Landmark Tasks: can neglect patients be classified consistently?
    Harvey M; Olk B
    Cortex; 2004; 40(4-5):659-65. PubMed ID: 15505976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left hemispatial neglect with a splenial lesion.
    Kesayan T; Gasoyan H; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2018 Aug; 24(4):220-226. PubMed ID: 30370810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of line length on bisection judgements in hemispatial neglect.
    Harvey M; Milner AD; Roberts RC
    Cortex; 1995 Dec; 31(4):711-22. PubMed ID: 8750028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual and tactile size distortion in a patient with right neglect.
    Pritchard CL; Dijkerman HC; McIntosh RD; Milner AD
    Neurocase; 2001; 7(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 11744780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Izawa M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 69(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 11080226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.
    Tegnér R; Levander M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1991 Oct; 54(10):882-7. PubMed ID: 1744642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triangular backgrounds shift the bias of line bisection performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Shulman MB; Alexander MP; McGlinchey-Berroth R; Milberg W
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jan; 72(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 11784828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential hand-neglect after a callosal lesion.
    Funayama M; Muramatsu T; Kato M
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Dec; 21(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 19057175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossover by line length and spatial location.
    Mennemeier M; Rapcsak SZ; Pierce C; Vezey E
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 11748897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and Landmark performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Olk B; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 11684161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.
    Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Callosal neglect in hydrocephalus.
    Jeong Y; Tsao JW; Efros DB; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2006 Dec; 12(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 17182398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.