These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12451616)

  • 21. Breast imaging flow models.
    Parikh JR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 17411578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Presidential remarks of the Special Collegium for Surgery].
    Jakab F
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Feb; 146(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 15830609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammography.
    Simeoni R
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Sep; 15(3):157. PubMed ID: 1471968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumer group report examines mammography standards.
    Volkers N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1991 Aug; 83(16):1138-40. PubMed ID: 1886146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer screening.
    Med J Aust; 1991 Apr; 154(7):494. PubMed ID: 2005857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Irresponsible quarrel concerning mammography guidelines].
    Aumiller J
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Mar; 121(12):401. PubMed ID: 108541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammographic screening.
    Cherry JK
    JAMA; 1994 Jun; 271(23):1827-8. PubMed ID: 8196136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editorial: breast pathology.
    Bilous M
    Pathology; 2001 Nov; 33(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 11827406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast exposure: nationwide trends (BENT). What is BENT?
    Md State Med J; 1978 Jul; 27(7):13. PubMed ID: 661392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Optimization of the mammography report].
    Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 9045228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Present-day technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Kochetova GP; Riudiger IuG; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2000; (1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10832400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Editorial Comment: Barriers and Enabling Factors That Affect Supplemental Screening.
    Niell BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1080. PubMed ID: 34499531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Zero-roentgen mammography.
    Annett CH
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):569. PubMed ID: 732785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.
    Miller D; Livingstone V; Herbison P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; 2008(1):CD002942. PubMed ID: 18254010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche.
    Duffy S; Tabár L; Smith RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159-62; discussion 162-6. PubMed ID: 12451615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Should mammography screening be promoted if quality assurance is lacking?
    Barmus B
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(1):135. PubMed ID: 8434090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Editorial commentary: Screening mammography.
    Lawrence W
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159. PubMed ID: 12451616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.