138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12451837)
1. Numerical field calculation of patient return electrodes in electrosurgery.
Raiser J; Golombeck MA; Dössel O
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():274-7. PubMed ID: 12451837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of patient return electrodes in electrosurgery by experimental investigations and numerical field calculations.
Golombeck MA; Dössel O; Raiser J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 Sep; 41(5):519-28. PubMed ID: 14572001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radio-frequency heating under ECG electrodes.
DeRosa JF; Gadsby PD
Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 502924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher currents, greater risks: preventing patient burns at the return-electrode site during high-current electrosurgical procedures.
ECRI
Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):273-9. PubMed ID: 16255231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrosurgery: part II. Technology, applications, and safety of electrosurgical devices.
Taheri A; Mansoori P; Sandoval LF; Feldman SR; Pearce D; Williford PM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Apr; 70(4):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 24629362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Burns and fires from electrosurgical active electrodes.
Health Devices; 1993; 22(8-9):421-2. PubMed ID: 8226019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. MegaDyne Mega 2000 return electrode.
Health Devices; 2000 Dec; 29(12):445-60. PubMed ID: 11190782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrosurgical dispersive electrodes heat cutaneous and subcutaneous skin layers.
Edrich J; Cookson CC
Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 3614035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of skin temperature elevation and heat diffusion with electrosurgical currents.
Aubry-Frize M; Leduc A
Med Instrum; 1980; 14(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 7453602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the role of capacitive coupling between the operating table and the return electrode of an electrosurgery unit in the modification of the current density distribution within the patients' body.
Bifulco P; Massa R; Cesarelli M; Romano M; Fratini A; Gargiulo GD; McEwan AL
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Aug; 12():80. PubMed ID: 23937865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of human penile electrical resistance and implication on safety for electrosurgery of penis.
Tsai VF; Chang HC; Liu SP; Kuo YC; Chen JH; Jaw FS; Hsieh JT
J Sex Med; 2010 Aug; 7(8):2891-8. PubMed ID: 20524977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modifications of electrosurgery electrodes.
Sebben JE
J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(10):908-12. PubMed ID: 1430546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: what does it mean?
Uyttendaele K; Grobstein S; Svetz P
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1978; 29(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 751436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-current potentials created by arcing during monopolar radiofrequency electrosurgery.
Tucker RD; Kramolowsky EV; Stasz P
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1990; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 2344553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proposed standard for evaluating the thermal performance of pediatric dispersive electrodes.
Kim Y; Webster JG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 3807797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skin burns resulting from the use of conductive distention/irrigation media during electrosurgery with a rollerablation electrode.
ECRI
Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):283-4. PubMed ID: 16255233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecologic and dermatologic electrosurgical units: a comparative review.
Ferris DG; Saxena S; Hainer BL; Searle JR; Powell JL; Gay JN
J Fam Pract; 1994 Aug; 39(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 8057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A proposed method for quantitative performance evaluation of electrosurgical dispersive electrodes.
Pearce JA
Med Instrum; 1979; 13(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 423821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization and mitigation of stray radiofrequency currents during monopolar resectoscopic electrosurgery.
Vilos GA; Newton DW; Odell RC; Abu-Rafea B; Vilos AG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16527716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [REM system--divided neutral electrode].
Mannshardt J
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():205-6. PubMed ID: 2078698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
