These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice. Cannon ML J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Salvaging a compromised tooth using a combination amalgam core/composite window technique. Meiers JC Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 15279491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Current adhesive dentistry as an alternative to amalgam: case history. Adams T Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12524873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct adhesive restoration of anterior teeth. Part 1. Fundamentals of excellence. de Araujo Júnior EM; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Vieira LC; de Andrada MA Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 15(3):233-40; quiz 241. PubMed ID: 12956050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aesthetic considerations in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Castany E; Chazel GC; Godet C; Pelissier B Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 15(9):705-12; quiz 714. PubMed ID: 14649054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct adhesive restoration of anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical protocol. de Araujo EM; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Vieira LC; de Andrada MA Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 15(5):351-7; quiz 359. PubMed ID: 12926402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites. Gordan VV; Shen C; Mjor IA Gen Dent; 2004; 52(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 15544214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advantages of electric-driven handpieces during tooth preparation. Soileau T Dent Today; 2005 May; 24(5):112, 114. PubMed ID: 15957643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Making it stick. Bartlett D Dent Update; 2008 Apr; 35(3):209. PubMed ID: 18507229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical considerations when utilizing modern self-etch adhesives. Blank JT Dent Today; 2005 Jan; 24(1):90-5; quiz 95, 101. PubMed ID: 15693364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Case report of a 40-year, five surface complex amalgam restoration. Chan DC; Grubbs K; Osborne JW Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 12413232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A high-density posterior composite used for an amalgam replacement. Adams TC Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10765814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]