These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12452141)

  • 1. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
    Wyser-Pratte RC
    Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "The sexual freedom cases"? Contraception, abortion, abstinence, and the Constitution.
    Cruz DB
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 2000; 35(2):299-383. PubMed ID: 12452156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RU 486 examined: impact of a new technology on an old controversy.
    Prothro G
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1997; 30(4):715-41. PubMed ID: 16514778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The legal status of the morning-after pill: abortion or birth control?
    Saylor S
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1991; 25(2):401-27. PubMed ID: 11659519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
    Kramlich M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA
    Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A feminist understanding of sex-selective abortion: solely a matter of choice?
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10(2):161-223. PubMed ID: 12739593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Abortion pill--a medication of women's choice].
    Sundby J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Apr; 128(7):808. PubMed ID: 18389024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liberty and community in constitutional law: the abortion cases in comparative perspective.
    Kommer DP
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(3):371-410. PubMed ID: 12186067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.
    Eberl JT
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.